2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2018.10.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Significance of Electromechanical Dyssynchrony and QRS Narrowing in Patients With Heart Failure Receiving Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…33 The QRS duration of CRT responders was shortened by 21 ms when compared with nonresponders, a phenomenon closely related to clinical outcomes that underscores the importance of multiparametric selection criteria. 29,30 There are important limitations to the present study and data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…33 The QRS duration of CRT responders was shortened by 21 ms when compared with nonresponders, a phenomenon closely related to clinical outcomes that underscores the importance of multiparametric selection criteria. 29,30 There are important limitations to the present study and data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…We hypoth- propriate CRT candidates and monitor response to therapy. 29,30 It is important to note that while CRT responders and nonresponders had a similar pre-CRT QRS duration, the responders had a far greater number of patients with a left bundle branch block. In left bundle branch block, there is pre-ejection septal contraction (also known as "septal flash"), followed by rebound septal re-lengthening and stretch due to late posterolateral LV activation; the result is impaired septal pump function and LV ejection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This study was a retrospective analysis of a prospective registry. 18,19 CRTwas indicated in patients with HFrEF and increased QRS duration. HFrEF was defined as the presence of HF (New York Heart Association functional class II, III, or ambulatory IV) despite optimal medical treatment and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) # 35%.…”
Section: Study Population and Clinical Datamentioning
confidence: 99%