2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2018.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical significance and prognostic relevance of KRAS, BRAF, PI3K and TP53 genetic mutation analysis for resectable and unresectable colorectal liver metastases: A systematic review of the current evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
125
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
4
125
1
Order By: Relevance
“…35 given the complex interactions of tumor location, MSI status, and type of chemotherapy; this will need to be further evaluated in the context of each primary tumor type. 16,37,38 The deleterious biological ramifications of SMAD4 mutation previously reported include aggressive in vitro/in vivo phenotype, late event in tumor clonality, high-frequency association with mucinous histology, and association with advanced/metastatic tumor stage. [39][40][41][42][43][44] The cellular mechanism is due to the loss of autocrine TGFβ suppressive effects, resulting in uncontrolled proliferation, loss of apoptosis, and epithelial to | 1111 mesenchymal transition progression.…”
Section: Rate Of Actionable Mutationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…35 given the complex interactions of tumor location, MSI status, and type of chemotherapy; this will need to be further evaluated in the context of each primary tumor type. 16,37,38 The deleterious biological ramifications of SMAD4 mutation previously reported include aggressive in vitro/in vivo phenotype, late event in tumor clonality, high-frequency association with mucinous histology, and association with advanced/metastatic tumor stage. [39][40][41][42][43][44] The cellular mechanism is due to the loss of autocrine TGFβ suppressive effects, resulting in uncontrolled proliferation, loss of apoptosis, and epithelial to | 1111 mesenchymal transition progression.…”
Section: Rate Of Actionable Mutationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13][14][15] The concept of leveraging mutation profiling for metastatic CRC surgery has been recently reported in the setting of hepatectomy with evidence that BRAF predicts worst overall outcome and RAS mutations portend a worse outcome, although this relationship is impacted by the type of resection and margin status. [16][17][18][19][20] Extended mutation profiling (50-gene panels) has not been explored for identifying mutations and their frequency in GIM-PM, nor has probing for mutations shared across multiple tumor types been investigated. LGMCP patient was excluded due to synchronous colon cancer, and one…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several research groups have provided evidence that two proto-oncogenes, KRAS and BRAF , are associated with resistance to chemotherapy and poor prognosis [ 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 ], as confirmed by the survival analysis of the BRAF mutated CRCLM included in the TCGA cohort ( Figure 4 B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…It is reported that PIK3CA mutation is related to older age, proximal tumors, mucinous histology, and KRAS mutation [17,18]. However, these studies do not stratify CRC cases by MMR status, since pMMR and dMMR tumors show distinct differences in clinicopathologic and molecular characteristics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%