Clinical setting and extent of premortem evaluation do not predict autopsy discrepancy rates

Abstract

Autopsy rates have been affected by a number of factors, including technological advances and clinician beliefs of the diminished value of the autopsy. Such factors have resulted in a cultural shift in medicine away from the autopsy. Despite this shift, a number of studies have shown significant differences between antemortem clinical diagnoses and postmortem findings. Surveys of clinician beliefs about the autopsy have pointed toward antemortem diagnostic advancements as an important factor in declining rates. No study to date has addressed the hypothesis that such perceptions in diagnostic certainty have been matched by an actual decay in the yield of valuable or new information obtained by the autopsy. To address this hypothesis, we retrospectively compared the class I and class II discrepancies identified in 284 patients who died in three clinical settings with differing intensities of antemortem diagnostic workup. Despite a significantly different intensity of antemortem workup for patients in each clinical setting, including patients on a medical intensive care unit, patients on a surgical service and patients in an affiliated nursing home, discrepancy rates were found to be similar. Overall discrepancy rates for the medical intensive care unit, surgery service and nursing home patients were 27.8, 32.7 and 31.3%, respectively (P ¼ 0.84). In addition, we found no statistical difference in the complexity of workup in discrepant and nondiscrepant cases in each clinical setting. Our study data refute the hypothesis that the intensity of antemortem diagnostic evaluation correlates with an actual decrease in the rate of major diagnostic discrepancies identified at autopsy.

Feasibility of liver weight estimation by postmortem computed tomography images: An autopsy study

“…More than a powerful tool for quality improvement in patient care, the autopsy generates accurate vital statistics, provides a better understanding of diseases, and drives progress in medicine . The procedure, which has changed little since the 19th century, consists of macroscopic observation, such as evisceration and measurement of the major organs, followed by histological analysis . Many physicians worldwide are concerned about decreased autopsy rates, which are assumed to be at least partially caused by clinical disinterest.…”

Unsuspected Lung Pathology in Autopsies of Children with Cancer

“…at the time of their last hospital admission, there were 3 patients in terminal stage and 1 in premortem 17 found similar rates of clinical-pathological discrepancy in three clinical settings that differed in the amount of antemortem diagnostic workup, thus refuting the hypothesis that the availability of diagnostic procedures decreases the frequency of discrepancies in the diagnosis. a systematic review by Shojania et al 2 concluded that the capacity of the autopsy to identify diagnoses unsuspected before death is high enough as to reinforce the recommendation of performing autopsies.…”

Zygomycosis Associated with HIV Infection and Liver Transplantation

“…With the superabundance of sophisticated and high-technology diagnostic testing available, it is widely assumed that autopsy rarely reveals any important undetected conditions, but the hypothesis that only the lack of testing leaves important conditions undiagnosed was recently tested by a study comparing the rate of finding major undiagnosed conditions at autopsy in patients who died in intensive care units, inpatient surgical units, and nursing homes [7]. The rate of finding major undiagnosed conditions was 27.8% for the medical intensive care unit patients, 32.7% for the surgery service patients, and 31.3% for the nursing home patients ( P = .84).…”