1999
DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199909000-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Score for Predicting Recurrence After Hepatic Resection for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Abstract: Resection of hepatic colorectal metastases may produce long-term survival and cure. Long-term outcome can be predicted from five criteria that are readily available for all patients considered for resection. Patients with up to two criteria can have a favorable outcome. Patients with three, four, or five criteria should be considered for experimental adjuvant trials. Studies of preoperative staging techniques or of adjuvant therapies should consider using such a score for stratification of patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

109
2,635
23
176

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3,350 publications
(2,943 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
109
2,635
23
176
Order By: Relevance
“…The clinical risk score, as defined previously, was evaluated. 1 Briefly, a point was assessed for each of the following five factors: (1) disease-free interval less than 12 months, (2) node-positive primary colorectal cancer, (3) greater than one tumor, (4) size of largest tumor greater than 5 cm and (5) pre-hepatectomy CEA 4200 ng/ml.…”
Section: Clinical Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The clinical risk score, as defined previously, was evaluated. 1 Briefly, a point was assessed for each of the following five factors: (1) disease-free interval less than 12 months, (2) node-positive primary colorectal cancer, (3) greater than one tumor, (4) size of largest tumor greater than 5 cm and (5) pre-hepatectomy CEA 4200 ng/ml.…”
Section: Clinical Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although 20 to 25% of colorectal carcinoma patients present with synchronous liver metastases, another 60% develop such metastases after the diagnosis of the primary tumor. 1,2 Surgical resection is potentially curative for colorectal cancer metastases confined to the liver, with a 5-year survival rate between 30 and 50%. 3 Some patients, however, recur early after resection and have a poor outcome.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The liver is the organ to which CRC most frequently metastasizes, with 15-25% of patients having synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) at presentation and a further 25-50% ultimately developing CRLM following resection of the primary tumor [2]. Hepatic resection offers the only hope of cure to patients with CRLM, providing 5-year survival rates of 30-50% depending upon selection criteria [3][4][5]. Unfortunately, cancer recurs in up to 75% of patients following hepatectomy, in the remnant liver and/or other sites [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most series, up to 25% of patients presenting with stage IV CRC undergo hepatic resection (Kopetz et al, 2009), with reported 5-year survival rates up to 50% (Taylor et al, 2010;Choti et al, 2002;Chua et al, 2011). However over one-half of patients will develop recurrence within 2 years (de Jong et al, 2009;Fong et al, 1999;Nordlinger et al, 1996), not getting any long-term survival benefit from hepatic resection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore difficulties remain in deciding who is a good candidate for liver resection. Many studies have examined several clinical and pathological factors, including number and size of CLM, disease-free interval from primary to CLM, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, primary tumor stage, synchronous or metachronous CLM, as potential prognostic determinants of survival after surgical resection of CLM, in order to establish a preoperative scoring system that is able to predict the risk of recurrence after resection, and ultimately allows the selection of those patients who may benefit more from surgery (Choti et al, 2002;de Jong et al, 2009;Fong et al, 1999;Nordlinger et al, 1996;Mann et al, 2004;Nagashima et al, 2006a,b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%