2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-263x.2008.00941.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical, salivary, and bacterial markers for caries risk assessment in schoolchildren: a 4‐year follow‐up

Abstract: In addition to the initial caries experience, tooth morphology and Snyder test proved to be useful predictors for caries. These three risk markers may be particularly useful in targeting caries prevention efforts in developing countries.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
1
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
21
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Modified Snyder's test has long been reported as a reliable prediction tool for caries increment. [3031] Poor correlation was reported between sugar consumption and caries activity during all time points of measurements throughout the study period. This implies that reduction in caries activity as result of our SOHPP was possibly due to antibacterial topical fluoride varnish[32] and povidone iodine therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modified Snyder's test has long been reported as a reliable prediction tool for caries increment. [3031] Poor correlation was reported between sugar consumption and caries activity during all time points of measurements throughout the study period. This implies that reduction in caries activity as result of our SOHPP was possibly due to antibacterial topical fluoride varnish[32] and povidone iodine therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the positive predictive ability of these models have been shown to be effective for both low and moderate caries risk children, the individual cost and time constraints imposed by a multiple test protocol have been found too restrictive for clinical practice. 10,44,47,61,62 Similar chairside limitations and cost, along with the poor predictive values (both low sensitivity and specificity) for the high risk child, have limited their acceptance by all but the most oral health conscious patient and dental professional. 58,61 Their clinical use in a public oral health setting, where resources are extremely limited, restricts their value and application to predominantly research purposes only at present.…”
Section: Caries Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…48,49,52,59,60,65,66 Most studies conclude that past caries experience is still the most reliable predictor of future caries experience in children and that a clinician's intuition or 'gut feeling' is often more accurate than current diagnostic technologies. 3,5,7,44,46,47,67,68 Unfortunately, active dental caries presence negates primary disease prevention in a literal MID sense and a clinician's intuition is not easily quantifiable for the statistical validation of this criterion in any prediction model. The challenge to researchers in this field is to identify other accurate and reliable markers for future caries experience that a clinician can use quickly and inexpensively.…”
Section: Caries Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rs6441989 is the number 1 in figure 1b, rs2073595 is number 2 and rs11716495 is number 3. Perez et al, 2009]. Those risk factors have been used by some clinicians as risk markers, but notwithstanding, there is not a predictive test that may precisely identify host predisposing conditions [Twetman and Fontana, 2009].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%