2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical safety of England's national programme for IT: A retrospective analysis of all reported safety events 2005 to 2011

Abstract: Events associated with NPfIT reinforce that the use of IT does create hazardous circumstances and can lead to patient harm or death. Large-scale patient safety events have the potential to affect many patients and clinicians, and this suggests that addressing them should be a priority for all major IT implementations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
81
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
6
81
3
Order By: Relevance
“…While the broad categories of problems we identified are similar to those previously reported in hospitals,19 20 23 we found that routine updates to software can be particularly problematic in general practice. Issues with software updates generated clinical errors that are unique to IT and can affect many patients at once.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While the broad categories of problems we identified are similar to those previously reported in hospitals,19 20 23 we found that routine updates to software can be particularly problematic in general practice. Issues with software updates generated clinical errors that are unique to IT and can affect many patients at once.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Incidents were categorised using an existing classification for safety problems associated with health IT 23. Problems were first divided into those primarily involving human factors or technical problems, and then assigned to one or more subclasses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to a recent study, problems involving human factors were four times more likely to result in harm to patients than technical problems, further stressing the importance of sociotechnical aspects. 18 Moreover, research confirms the importance of a sociotechnical perspective in system design. 45 Incident reporting systems provide a mechanism for identifying safety risks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Unintended effects not only disrupt the delivery of care but also pose risks to patient safety [10,11]. The adverse outcomes against design intention may be due to context factors such as different health settings, different clinical domains, technical configuration context, or users not adequately prepared [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%