2017
DOI: 10.4022/jafib.1548
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Role of Dominant Frequency Measurements in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation – A Systematic Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This notion led to hypothesis that ablating DF sites might be a valid target for AF ablation (Mandapati et al, 2000 ; Sanders et al, 2005 ). Indeed, the presence of high frequency sites inversely correlated to procedural success rates (Gadenz et al, 2017 ; Kimata et al, 2018 ) but targeting DF sites did not consistently lead to improvement of clinical outcome (Atienza et al, 2014 ; Gadenz et al, 2017 ). It is unclear whether these negative outcomes entail that CFAE and high DF indicate bystander sites instead of AF driver sites or are due to technical limitations of the methods applied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This notion led to hypothesis that ablating DF sites might be a valid target for AF ablation (Mandapati et al, 2000 ; Sanders et al, 2005 ). Indeed, the presence of high frequency sites inversely correlated to procedural success rates (Gadenz et al, 2017 ; Kimata et al, 2018 ) but targeting DF sites did not consistently lead to improvement of clinical outcome (Atienza et al, 2014 ; Gadenz et al, 2017 ). It is unclear whether these negative outcomes entail that CFAE and high DF indicate bystander sites instead of AF driver sites or are due to technical limitations of the methods applied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike such electrogram parameters, with focal impulse and rotor mapping (FIRM) conduction patterns are identified that putatively describe focal and rotational activity. Narayan et al ( 2012 ); Swarup et al ( 2014 ) Unfortunately, targeting these substrate parameters has variable outcomes in clinical trials and need further validation (Gadenz et al, 2017 ; Krummen et al, 2017 ; van der Does and de Groot, 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia diagnosed in clinical practice. It is estimated that AF will affect 6 to 12 million people in the United States by 2050 . Diverse therapeutic strategies have been employed for the conversion of AF to normal sinus rhythm including electrical cardioversion and chronic daily antiarrhythmic medications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DF can then be displayed on a 3D map to guide the ablator to sites of high DF thought to be driving the AF (focal source or rotor). The aim of such analysis is to detect sites of high frequency that have been hypothesized to “drive” the fibrillation process (Jalife et al, 2002 ) These sites have been shown by retrospective analysis to identify effective ablation areas (Sanders et al, 2005 ) In an elegant animal study by Kalifa et al, areas of fractionation were demonstrated at the periphery of areas of high dominant frequency (Kalifa et al, 2006 ) The proximity of high DF and CFAE sites has also been demonstrated in high-density mapping of human AF (Stiles et al, 2008 ) Of note, most studies examining DF guided ablation have used off-line analysis, although real-time analysis has also been reported albeit without incremental outcome (Atienza et al, 2014 ) In a systematic review of DF-based approaches, Gadenz et al concluded that DF-based approaches are a useful marker of ablation outcome; however, direct intervention targeting DF sites appears premature with mixed results and too few studies (Gadenz et al, 2017 ) A more recent study using a novel frequency analysis algorithm and longer duration of AF electrograms in search for temporally stable AF drivers has shown some promise (Kimata et al, 2018 ) Ongoing work will help refine our armamentarium toward future targeting of high DF sites to improve outcomes (Sanders et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%