2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2020.03.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical risk stratification of children with SIOPEL high-risk hepatoblastoma in Taiwan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the features were similar between our study and one of the largest studies on hepatoblastoma conducted by Hsu et al ( 30 ) at the National Taiwan University Hospital ( Table 2 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Most of the features were similar between our study and one of the largest studies on hepatoblastoma conducted by Hsu et al ( 30 ) at the National Taiwan University Hospital ( Table 2 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Hepatoblastoma is the most common liver malignancy in children with an incidence of approximately 1.2-1.5 cases per million [8 , 9] . It accounts for 1% of the pediatric malignancies [9] and it is usually diagnosed before the age of 3 years [8] . These type of liver tumors arise from pluripotent stem cells derived from hepatoblast which can differentiate mainly into epithelial and mesenchymal elements [10] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study by Huang et al showed a comparative analysis of the COG and CHIC-HS risk stratification methods, and their findings led them to conclude that the CHIC-HS method has more accuracy in predicting survival outcomes ( 15 ). In contrast, Hsu et al observed no statistically significant variation in survival rates between children classified as intermediate-risk and high-risk when using the CHIC-HS risk stratification method ( 16 ). Despite the endeavors mentioned above, the established prognostic variables and the generally recognized staging methods need to offer an ideal framework for accurately evaluating individual patient survival probability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%