2006
DOI: 10.3341/kjo.2006.20.1.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Results of Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy using a Microdebrider

Abstract: PurposeThe success rate of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy has been increasing with the development of better instruments and techniques. We conducted this study to evaluate the clinical results of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy using a Microdebrider, which has also been used for functional endoscopic sinus surgery.MethodsWe selected 76 patients (with a total of 84 affected eyes) who had been diagnosed with a nasolacrimal duct obstruction. These patients underwent an endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy using a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Worse 0 0 0 0 Scores of 1, 2, and 3 are considered as successful while 4 and 5 as failed; POD: post-operative day. 12,14,15 This indicates that chronic dacryocystitis is more common in females as compared to males in adults.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Worse 0 0 0 0 Scores of 1, 2, and 3 are considered as successful while 4 and 5 as failed; POD: post-operative day. 12,14,15 This indicates that chronic dacryocystitis is more common in females as compared to males in adults.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11] Yoon et al selected 76 patients (with a total of 84 affected eyes) who had been diagnosed with a nasolacrimal duct obstruction. 12 These patients underwent an endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy using a microdebrider, According to their study the symptoms were alleviated in 72 eyes, with a primary success rate of 85.7%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its minimally invasive approach reduces complications by avoiding adjacent tissue damage and improves surgical outcomes. 21 It should only rarely be used at speeds above 3000 rpm and never directed toward the orbit. 22 It can be used at very low speeds to delicately and safely remove tissue.…”
Section: Techniques To Optimize Success In Ree-dcrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 12-19 60.0% Mathew (2004) 9 16 9 (16-21) 63.0% Metson (1991) 10 12 7-25 75.0% Ragab (2012) 11 76 12 80.6%-82.9% Paik (2012) 12 82 8 ± 2 SD 80.7%-84% Weidenbecher (1994) 13 11 Unknown 82% ElGuindy (2000) 14 18 14 (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20) 83.3% Zeldovich (2009) 15 19 9 (1-15) 84% Korkut (2010) 16 44 11 (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24) 84.1% Puxeddu (2000) 17 8 18 (minimum) 87.5% Choussy (2010) 18 17 56 (14-148) 94%…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…2,3 New applications for this device continue to be developed, including recent reports in facial flap contouring 4 and endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. 5 Its use is now commonplace in endonasal surgery, although it has not previously been discussed in open orbital surgery. We report 3 cases in which the characteristics of the microdebrider were optimal to assist in the removal of difficult-to-handle orbital contents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%