Clinical relevance of + patch test reactions to lanolin alcohol

Trummer, Michaela; Aberer, Werner; Kränke, Birger

doi:10.1034/j.1600-0536.2002.460216.x

Cited by 5 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Moreover, the patients were referred for tertiary care. As a result, the prevalence of patients with lanolin contact allergy (28.6%, 95%CI: 25.1%‐32.3%) is higher than is normally reported . The positive association between atopic dermatitis and lanolin contact allergy has previously been reported .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 79%

“…As a result, the prevalence of patients with lanolin contact allergy (28.6%, 95%CI: 25.1%-32.3%) is higher than is normally reported. 4,6,7,9,10 The positive association between atopic dermatitis and lanolin contact allergy has previously been reported. 4,7,8 An impaired skin barrier in atopic patients, together with the prolonged use of lanolin-containing topical medicaments, possibly leads to an increased risk of sensitization.…”

Section: Prevalence and Risk Factorsmentioning

confidence: 72%

“…Atopic dermatitis, leg ulcers and lower‐extremity venous stasis dermatitis have been identified as risk factors for the development of lanolin contact allergy . The reported prevalence of lanolin sensitization in referred dermatitis patients has varied from 1.2% to 6.9% between several studies . Lanolin alcohol 30% pet.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…1,2,4,[6][7][8] The reported prevalence of lanolin sensitization in referred dermatitis patients has varied from 1.2% to 6.9% between several studies. 4,6,7,9,10 Lanolin alcohol 30% pet. is the standard patch test agent for diagnosing lanolin contact allergy, and has been included in the European baseline series (EBS) since 1969.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Diagnosing lanolin contact allergy with lanolin alcohol and Amerchol L101

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The prevalence of lanolin contact allergy in dermatitis patients varies from 1.2% to 6.9%. Different lanolin derivatives are used in patch testing. Objectives To determine which combination of lanolin derivatives is most effective in patch testing for the diagnosis of lanolin contact allergy. Methods A retrospective analysis of patients patch tested between 2016 and 2017 was performed. Patients were eligible if they had been tested with lanolin alcohol 30% pet., Amerchol L101 50% pet., and a supplementary series containing other lanolin derivatives. Lanolin alcohol and Amerchol L101 were tested in duplicate. Results Of 594 patients, 28.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 25.1%‐32.3%) had a positive patch test reaction to at least one lanolin derivative. Reactions to lanolin alcohol (14.7%, 95%CI: 11.3%‐18.2%) and Amerchol L101 (15.0%, 95%CI: 11.5%‐18.5%) were common in the routinely tested series. Reactions to other test preparations were significantly less frequent ( P < 0.05). The addition of Amerchol L101 to lanolin alcohol significantly increased the number of positive cases (odds ratio 1.79, P < 0.001). Conclusions The combination of lanolin alcohol and Amerchol L101 is effective in patch testing for the diagnosis of lanolin contact allergy. Routinely testing with other lanolin derivatives may not be worthwhile, as it detects only a few additional patients.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 79%

Section: Prevalence and Risk Factorsmentioning

confidence: 72%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Diagnosing lanolin contact allergy with lanolin alcohol and Amerchol L101

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…They also prevent liquid materials from separating from solids, which might result in sweating or blooming in the final product [20,21,25,29,30]. Nonetheless, despite the benefits, after repeated or prolonged use, lanolin may cause contact allergy in 1.2% to 6.9% of dermatitis patients [75][76][77][78][79].…”

Section: Ingredients Of Lipstickmentioning

confidence: 99%

Lipsticks History, Formulations, and Production: A Narrative Review

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A considerable amount of literature has been published on several aspects of lipsticks production. To date, there is no collation of studies related to lipsticks production that has been published. This review was conducted to examine information about the history of lipsticks; ingredients used in the preparation of lipsticks, focusing on the natural and chemical ingredients; methods of preparation for the lipsticks; and the characterization of the lipsticks. A literature search for English language articles was conducted by searching electronic databases including Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar. Overall, the evidence indicates that lipsticks have been used since ancient times and are among the highest demand cosmetics. The findings of this review summarize those of earlier studies that explained the use of different types of ingredients in the manufacturing processes of lipsticks. It highlights the importance of using green technology and ingredients to fabricate lipsticks to avoid potential side effects such as skin irritation and allergy reaction.

show abstract

Réponse de G. Guillet, Poitiers

2005

Annales de Dermatologie et de Vénéréologie

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Clinical relevance of + patch test reactions to lanolin alcohol

Cited by 5 publications

References 3 publications

Diagnosing lanolin contact allergy with lanolin alcohol and Amerchol L101

Diagnosing lanolin contact allergy with lanolin alcohol and Amerchol L101

Lipsticks History, Formulations, and Production: A Narrative Review

Réponse de G. Guillet, Poitiers

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About