Clinical Relevance of Closed-Incision Negative Pressure Therapy (ciNPT) for SSI-Risk Reduction in Vascular Surgery Through a Groin Incision

The wound adjuncts effect of closed incision negative pressure wound therapy on stopping groin surgical site wound infection in arterial surgery: A meta‐analysis

“…In the studies nominated for the meta-analysis, 2133 subjects with groin surgical wounds of arterial surgery were in the picked studies' baseline, 1043 of them were using ciNPWT, and 1090 were using standard care. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] The ciNPWT had a significantly lower SWSI, superficial SWSI, and deep SWSI compared with the standard care in groin surgical wounds of arterial surgery. Though precautions should be taken when commerce with the consequences because some of the picked studies for this meta-analysis was with low sample sizes (4 studies out of 15 were less than or equal to 100 subjects).…”

“…From a total of 2186 linked investigation that was inspected, 15 articles published between 2013 and 2022 fit the inclusion criteria and were selected and involved in the study 11‐25 . Table 2 offerings the verdicts from these studies.…”

“…In the studies nominated for the meta‐analysis, 2133 subjects with groin surgical wounds of arterial surgery were in the picked studies' baseline, 1043 of them were using ciNPWT, and 1090 were using standard care 11‐25 . The ciNPWT had a significantly lower SWSI, superficial SWSI, and deep SWSI compared with the standard care in groin surgical wounds of arterial surgery.…”

Effect of closed incision negative pressure wound treatment in vascular surgery: A meta‐analysis

“…Following an assessment of 1456 pertinent examinations, 10 tests released between 2017 and 2022 were included in the meta-analysis since they matched the criteria for inclusion. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] Table 2 summarises the findings of these investigations. 2082 personals with vascular surgery were in the used studies' starting point, 992 of them were using closed-incision NPW treatment, and 1090 were using controls.…”

“…Since then, closed‐incision NPW management has been found to have a lower rate of surgical site infection than standard care in two meta‐analyses 6 . Numerous randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effectiveness of closed‐incision NPW care have recently surfaced in the vascular field 7–16 . So, this meta‐analysis compared closed‐incision NPW therapy versus standard care in adult personals who had undergone vascular surgeries to determine which was more effective and safe.…”