2005
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.141.4.507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Recognition of Actinic Keratoses in a High-Risk Population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
2
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
67
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Dermatologists usually confused AK with seborrhoeic keratosis, basal cell carcinoma, Bowen's disease, or discoid lupus erythematosus. In previous investigations, the positive predictive rate was 74-94% [21,22], much higher than in our study. Such a high misdiagnosis rate may imply a Chinese dermatologists' lack of sufficient attention and awareness to AK.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…Dermatologists usually confused AK with seborrhoeic keratosis, basal cell carcinoma, Bowen's disease, or discoid lupus erythematosus. In previous investigations, the positive predictive rate was 74-94% [21,22], much higher than in our study. Such a high misdiagnosis rate may imply a Chinese dermatologists' lack of sufficient attention and awareness to AK.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…AK typically arise in areas of chronic sun exposure of the face, neck and forearms and represent one stage in the continuum from subclinical keratinocyte dysplasia to invasive squamous cell carcinoma. The diagnosis of AK is generally based on clinical inspection, and studies have shown positive predictive values for clinical diagnosis between 81 and 94% when compared to histopathologic examination [33,34]. Biopsy with histological evaluation is not routinely performed in the diagnostic work-up for AK, nor is histology generally performed to evaluate treatment efficacy, with the exception of selected outcome studies and for the detection of residual, recurrent or invasive disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Histological evaluation at 3 month revealed recurrence in three patients treated with laser resurfacing, however, clinically, a recurrence was seen in five patients in the same group. This suggests that recurrence rates can be overestimated, and probably also underestimated, and that histological investigation is essential to determine the efficacy of the treatment [35]. In most studies, however, no histological examinations before and/or after treatment are performed [17,18,21,23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%