1993
DOI: 10.5014/ajot.47.7.605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Reasoning in Occupational Therapy: An Integrative Review

Abstract: The occupational therapy literature has been comprehensively reviewed to identify various theoretical answers to the question of what is clinical reasoning. Authors to date have two primary answers to this question, which we labeled scientific reasoning and narrative reasoning. Additional literature addresses the influence of personal and practice contexts on clinical practice. These are labeled pragmatic reasoning and are proposed to be an integral part of clinical reasoning. Pragmatic reasoning considers iss… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
113
0
6

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(29 reference statements)
2
113
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Later research suggests expanded dimensions of clinical reasoning which are distinct from hypothetico-deductive reasoning. These forms of reasoning include: intuitive reasoning (Benner & Tanner, 1987); narrative reasoning (Mattingly, 1991); interactive and conditional reasoning (Fleming, 1991); practical reasoning (Jensen, Gwyer, Hack & Shepard, 1999); and pragmatic reasoning (Schell & Cervero, 1993).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later research suggests expanded dimensions of clinical reasoning which are distinct from hypothetico-deductive reasoning. These forms of reasoning include: intuitive reasoning (Benner & Tanner, 1987); narrative reasoning (Mattingly, 1991); interactive and conditional reasoning (Fleming, 1991); practical reasoning (Jensen, Gwyer, Hack & Shepard, 1999); and pragmatic reasoning (Schell & Cervero, 1993).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pragmatic reasoning was first proposed by Schell and Cervero (1993) and further developed by Boyt Schell and Schell (2008). Pragmatic reasoning starts from the middle part of the contextual framework described above and encompasses bands 4-6.…”
Section: Putting Mary's Practice In Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Narrative reasoning can focus on either the illness or occupational perspective or narrative of the client's story (Hamilton, 2008). Schell and Cervero (1993) described the effects of context on therapy as pragmatic reasoning and viewed this as consistent with the emerging sociological concept of situated cognition. This form of reasoning focuses on the practical realities and considers the possibilities related to the practice context and the client and therapist's personal contexts (Barris, 1987;Schell, 2008b).…”
Section: Clinical Reasoning Tracksmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…For example, cue acquisition is evident when using each of the procedural, interactive and conditional reasoning tracks but what differs between these tracks is the type of cues occupational therapists attend to, therefore providing some evidence of a common underlying problem solving process. Thus these cognitive operations of problem solving; cue acquisition, hypothesis generation, refinement and verification (Carrier et al, 2010, Chapparo & Ranka, 2008, Leicht & Dickerson, 2001, also described by several occupational therapy authors as scientific reasoning (Chapparo & Ranka, 2008;Schell & Cervero 1993;Tomlin, 2008), may deserve greater attention than they have to date.…”
Section: Cognitive Processes Of Reasoning and Decision-makingmentioning
confidence: 99%