2008
DOI: 10.1016/s1569-1861(09)70005-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Reasoning and the International Classification of Functioning: A Linking Framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There were limitations in the search strategies, for instance, grey literature and specific databases such as PEDro were not included in this review, which reduces the sample size of an individual’s lived experiences and a generalizable impact from reassurance. This review was conducted independently, increasing the risk of a confirmation bias [ 65 ]. Methodological limitations may exist resulting from our choice of the critical appraisal tool.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were limitations in the search strategies, for instance, grey literature and specific databases such as PEDro were not included in this review, which reduces the sample size of an individual’s lived experiences and a generalizable impact from reassurance. This review was conducted independently, increasing the risk of a confirmation bias [ 65 ]. Methodological limitations may exist resulting from our choice of the critical appraisal tool.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Constructs were defined as "central" when they clearly served as the main focus of the article; constructs were "peripheral" when another topic was central and they were included or mentioned but not in a detailed or integrated fashion. The majority of articles originated in Canada (n = 14, 31%; (Benjamin-Thomas & Rudman, 2018;Grenier, 2020;Hammell, 2011Hammell, , 2013Hammell, , 2016Iwama et al, 2009;King et al, 2006;Law, 1993;Martins & Reid, 2007;Restall et al, 2018;Townsend et al, 2003Townsend et al, , 2011Vrkljan, 2005;Wieringa & McColl, 1987), the United States (n = 12, 27%; (Agner, 2020;Causey-Upton, 2015;Clifton & Taff, 2021;Grady, 1995;Gupta, 2006;Jaegers et al, 2020;Muñoz, 2007;Schaber, 2002a;Taff et al, 2014;Taff & Blash, 2017;Talero et al, 2015;Wood et al, 2017), Australia (n = 7, 16%; (Frew et al, 2008;Goh et al, 2019;Hitch & Pepin, 2021;Nelson, 2007;Pereira, 2017;Pereira et al, 2020;Whiteford et al, 2018), South Africa (n = 3, 7%; (du Toit, 2008;Janse van Rensburg, 2018;Mthembu, 2021); and Brazil (n = 2, 4%, (Malfitano & Lopes, 2018;McInerney et al, 2007) with the remaining seven articles each representing a single country including Croatia…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the ICF model emphasizes that rehabilitation should not focus only on body dysfunctions, but should address their implications on the person's ability to participate in daily life (Frew et al, 2008;Humphry, 2002). According to the ICF, participation is one of the main outcome measures of rehabilitation (Humphry, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%