1997
DOI: 10.1177/107110079701800315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Rating Systems for the Ankle-Hindfoot, Midfoot, Hallux, and Lesser Toes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
422
0
9

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 389 publications
(431 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
422
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…We also recorded the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score which ranges from 0 to 100 (score of 90 to 100, excellent; 80 to 89, good; 65 to 79, fair; <65, poor). 29 Patient satisfaction was, subjectively, determined on a scale of overall satisfaction, including very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, neutral, somewhat dissatisfied and very dissatisfied.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also recorded the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score which ranges from 0 to 100 (score of 90 to 100, excellent; 80 to 89, good; 65 to 79, fair; <65, poor). 29 Patient satisfaction was, subjectively, determined on a scale of overall satisfaction, including very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, neutral, somewhat dissatisfied and very dissatisfied.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients were assessed pre-operatively and one to two years after operation using the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot score [9]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This clinician‐based questionnaire has four versions, each specific to the function of one anatomic region of the foot and ankle that are the ankle‐hindfoot, the midfoot, the hallux, and the lesser toes. Each version is used independently and scores the categories pain, function, and alignment to a maximum of 100 points (Kitaoka, Alexander, Adelaar, Nunley, Meyerson, & Sanders, ; Schneider & Jurenitsch, ; Ceccarelli, Calderazzi, & Pedrazzi, ). For this study we assessed the AOFAS ankle‐hindfoot, midfoot and hallux metatarsophalangeal (MTP)‐interphalangeal (IP) scores of all of the patients.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%