2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.11.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical, Radiographic, and Surgical Presentation of Subscapularis Tendon Tears: A Retrospective Analysis of 139 Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“… 25 , 26 It has recently been suggested that tear size correlates to MR imaging sensitivity, with larger tears having higher sensitivity than smaller tears. 10 , 27 …”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 25 , 26 It has recently been suggested that tear size correlates to MR imaging sensitivity, with larger tears having higher sensitivity than smaller tears. 10 , 27 …”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowledge of presentation, detection, and repair of subscapularis tears are paramount for any practising orthopaedist who treats common shoulder conditions, as these lesions are at times identified on diagnostic shoulder arthroscopy or during repair of the posterosuperior rotator cuff or associated biceps pathology that are missed on pre-operative imaging. 7 - 10 The focus of this review is on arthroscopic management of tears of the subscapularis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, full thickness tears are generally indicated for surgery [8, 9]. While a thorough physical exam is important, the sensitivity and tear size correlation of clinical exam are inferior to the sensitivity of MRI (100% in full thickness tears) [10]. Further, the reported sensitivity of exam maneuvers is variable in the literature, with Naimark et al reporting a 61% sensitivity with the belly-press maneuver and 63% with the lift-off test [10]; Barth et al suggest a superior sensitivity with the bear-hug maneuver (60%), while other special exams had only 40% sensitivity [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a thorough physical exam is important, the sensitivity and tear size correlation of clinical exam are inferior to the sensitivity of MRI (100% in full thickness tears) [10]. Further, the reported sensitivity of exam maneuvers is variable in the literature, with Naimark et al reporting a 61% sensitivity with the belly-press maneuver and 63% with the lift-off test [10]; Barth et al suggest a superior sensitivity with the bear-hug maneuver (60%), while other special exams had only 40% sensitivity [11]. Nonetheless, isolated rotator cuff injury to the subscapularis is a rare occurrence that necessitates high clinical suspicion, particularly in the setting of the classic forced abduction-external rotation injury mechanism [8, 12, 13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uglavnom su traumatske, nalazimo ih u mlađoj i aktivnijoj populaciji, te kod prednje luksacije ramena starijih ljudi. Mehanizam ozljede koji dovodi do rupture SSC-a je forsirana vanjska rotacija ruke uz otpor ili ekstenzija ruke koja se nalazi u abdukciji [27][28][29][30][31][32] . U kliničkoj slici dominira prednja i anterolateralna bolnost, ograničenje aktivne, a uz razvoj kontrakture i pasivne pokretljivosti ramena, znaci instabiliteta i ozljede CLMBB-a, te u slučaju potpune rupture i povećan pasivni opseg vanjske rotacije ozlijeđenog ramena.…”
unclassified