2009
DOI: 10.1002/ppi.196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical psychologists do politics: Attitudes and reactions of Israeli psychologists toward the political

Abstract: This article presents an analysis of a survey among Israeli clinical psychologists, examining their attitudes towards diverse political issues. The survey involved the distribution of 600 questionnaires, 115 of which were returned. Within this framework, psychologists were asked to relate to questions regarding political issues in psychotherapy and the ways of dealing with them, socio‐political issues in psychology studies and training processes, socio‐political involvement of psychologists as citizens or as p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite growing interest in investigating both patients’ and therapists’ perspectives on the therapeutic process, there is still a very limited body of research on the effects of politics on psychotherapy processes, with a lack of empirical research on the topic (McCarthy & Saks, ; Milton & Legg, ). Generally, politics is rarely discussed in clinical training programs and psychology academic programs (Avissar, ). This is quite surprising given the significant effect of the political climate on patients and therapists’ everyday lives, especially on patients from marginalized and disadvantaged communities who are most affected by shifts in policy and civil rights legislation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite growing interest in investigating both patients’ and therapists’ perspectives on the therapeutic process, there is still a very limited body of research on the effects of politics on psychotherapy processes, with a lack of empirical research on the topic (McCarthy & Saks, ; Milton & Legg, ). Generally, politics is rarely discussed in clinical training programs and psychology academic programs (Avissar, ). This is quite surprising given the significant effect of the political climate on patients and therapists’ everyday lives, especially on patients from marginalized and disadvantaged communities who are most affected by shifts in policy and civil rights legislation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hegemonic psychotherapeutic discourse has been criticized for emphasizing intrapersonal processes while ignoring—or at best underestimating—the socio-cultural context in which the individual lives and through which suffering emerges (Avissar, 2009; Cushman, 1990; Masson, 1988; Nakash et al., 2009; Parker, 1999; Prilleltensky et al., 2008). This is despite the accumulation of research attesting to the impact of social determinants of mental health inequities (Alegria et al., 2009; Braveman et al., 2011; Nakash et al., 2012, 2013, 2014a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A growing tendency to include the political in therapeutic discourse can be observed from the late 1980s (Avissar, ). This has found expression in theoretical and conceptual changes in relation to therapy; in growing recognition of the role of political variables in psychotherapy; and in increasing reference to the possible effects on political reality of psychology, including its therapeutic branches.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%