2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical profile of comorbid dysmenorrhea and bladder sensitivity: a cross-sectional analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At an initial screening session, participants completed questionnaire measures encompassing medical, surgical, psychological, and gynecological history. A full list of all questionnaires administered in the larger clinical trial are reported elsewhere (Tu et al, 2020); however, those pertinent in the present investigation are described here and reported in Table 1. In particular, a subset of questions from the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI; Derogatis & Melisaratos, 1983) representing the somatic symptom subscale evaluated the psychological distress related to the perception of bodily discomfort. Participants rated on a 5-point scale of distress a series of questions that assessed perceptions of bodily pain, such as "Faintness or dizziness", "Pains in heart or chest", "Numbness or tingling in parts of your body", etc.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At an initial screening session, participants completed questionnaire measures encompassing medical, surgical, psychological, and gynecological history. A full list of all questionnaires administered in the larger clinical trial are reported elsewhere (Tu et al, 2020); however, those pertinent in the present investigation are described here and reported in Table 1. In particular, a subset of questions from the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI; Derogatis & Melisaratos, 1983) representing the somatic symptom subscale evaluated the psychological distress related to the perception of bodily discomfort. Participants rated on a 5-point scale of distress a series of questions that assessed perceptions of bodily pain, such as "Faintness or dizziness", "Pains in heart or chest", "Numbness or tingling in parts of your body", etc.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 To compare the bladder test results with adult findings, we conducted a pilot analysis comparing this data set with our prior published data. 59 Because our prior cohort recruited a highly enriched sample of adult participants with both dysmenorrhea and bladder sensitivity, the full raw data set would not be an appropriate comparison. Therefore, for this comparison, we analyzed a subset of the full adult data set that would correspond to the approximate incidence in the community of both pain free controls (50%), moderate/severe dysmenorrhea (;40%), and moderate/severe dysmenorrhea with bladder sensitivity (;10%).…”
Section: Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bladder sensitivity was assessed; using a noninvasive filling task, we previously validated in adult females to identify subclinical intermediate phenotypes for BPS. 22,59,60,63 Before the study visit, parents were instructed to make sure adolescents were well hydrated, and there were no restrictions on how much adolescents could drink before testing. To avoid diuresis, adolescents were instructed to avoid caffeine 6 hours before the testing.…”
Section: Experimental Bladder Pain Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27,28 This group's experimental profile and presence of mild clinical symptoms (occasional mild symptoms below the threshold for diagnosis of chronic pain conditions) suggest an increased risk of developing chronic pelvic pain. 27,28 In this study, we compare serum sex steroid levels and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) from women with DYSB to healthy pain-free controls (HC), women with dysmenorrhea (DYS ¼ dysmenorrhea without bladder sensitivity, or other chronic pain conditions), and those formally diagnosed with bladder pain syndrome (BPS). We also examined the relationship of sex steroids with psychological profiles and experimental pain sensitivity to understand whether their role on pain experience is related to these common potentially contributing factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27,28 This group's experimental profile and presence of mild clinical symptoms (occasional mild symptoms below the threshold for diagnosis of chronic pain conditions) suggest an increased risk of developing chronic pelvic pain. 27,28…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%