1993
DOI: 10.1016/0163-4453(93)93488-p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical profile of acute diarrhoea cases infected with the new epidemic strain of Vibrio cholerae O139: designation of the disease as cholera

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
38
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The only other serogroup known to cause epidemic cholera (O139) emerged in 1992 in the Bay of Bengal region and has remained endemic to this region (1,41). The O139 Bengal strains cause disease with severity comparable to the severity of the disease caused by O1 strains, and prior exposure to O1 strains does not provide protection against O139 infections (7,37). Molecular epidemiological studies (ribotyping, fingerprinting, multilocus enzyme electrophoresis, etc.)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only other serogroup known to cause epidemic cholera (O139) emerged in 1992 in the Bay of Bengal region and has remained endemic to this region (1,41). The O139 Bengal strains cause disease with severity comparable to the severity of the disease caused by O1 strains, and prior exposure to O1 strains does not provide protection against O139 infections (7,37). Molecular epidemiological studies (ribotyping, fingerprinting, multilocus enzyme electrophoresis, etc.)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cholera is a waterborne disease that afflicts millions of people every year. The etiological agent of the disease is Vibrio cholerae belonging to serogroups O1 and O139 (4,29). Members of the O1 serogroup have been further subdivided into Ogawa and Inaba serotypes and El Tor and classical biotypes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The disease caused by 0139 strains was reported to be indistinguishable from cholera in clinical features and response to treatment [4]. As most of the affected patients were adults who were not primed previously with the 0139 serogroup and prior exposure to l ?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%