2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.reumae.2015.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Profile, Level of Affection and Therapeutic Management of Patients With Osteoarthritis in Primary Care: The Spanish Multicenter Study EVALÚA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this cohort, 56.8% of the patients with knee pain had radiological degenerative changes, and in concordance with previous studies (20,30), KL 3 was the most frequently identified group. Interestingly, 24% of the patients without radiographic degenerative changes presented ultrasonographic findings of OA.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In this cohort, 56.8% of the patients with knee pain had radiological degenerative changes, and in concordance with previous studies (20,30), KL 3 was the most frequently identified group. Interestingly, 24% of the patients without radiographic degenerative changes presented ultrasonographic findings of OA.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…12,13 Surgically induced models, such as the destabilization of the medial meniscus (DMM) or anterior cruciate ligament transection (ACLT), generate knee joint instability responsible for progressive articular degeneration mimicking human posttraumatic OA. 14 Although in human knee OA both knees are involved in more than 75% of the cases, 15 bilateral mouse models of OA seem to have been rarely used. 16…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We conducted a sensitivity analysis to explore heterogeneity related to risk of bias. When studies scored as having a high risk of bias were removed (n = 5 studies) (46–48,67,69), the pooled prescribing estimate remained similar (43.8% [95% CI 36.8, 51.1], n = 46 studies, high quality of evidence I 2 = 5.1%) (11,12,25,26,28–46,49–56,58–61,58–64,65,66,68,70–73) compared to the original estimate with high heterogeneity (43.1% [95% CI 36.3, 50.1], n = 51 studies, I 2 = 99.9%, low quality of evidence). A post hoc sensitivity analysis was conducted to explore the primary analyses using an alternative statistical approach (see Supplementary Figure 1, available on the Arthritis Care & Research website at https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.25157), which resulted in less conservative estimates than our original model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The pooled prevalence of NSAIDs varied widely across geographical locations. The pooled estimate of NSAIDs prescribing was highest in South Asia at 83.4% (95% CI 74.8, 89.4; n = 4 studies, I 2 = 3.0%, moderate quality of evidence) (37,47,49,57), followed by Latin America and Caribbean at 68.5% (95% CI 66.8, 70.1; n = 1 study, I 2 = 0%, high quality of evidence) (33), East Asia and Pacific at 46.8% (95% CI 35.0, 58.9; n = 10 studies, I 2 = 31.7%, high quality of evidence) (12,25,32,38,40,51,53,58–60), Europe and Central Asia at 40.2% (95% CI 31.8, 49.3; n = 23 studies, I 2 = 12.2%, moderate quality of evidence) (26,27,28,29,39,42,43,45,46,48,50,52,54–56,61–68), Middle East and North Africa at 34.1% (95% CI 33.9, 34.3; n = 1 study, I 2 = 0%, high quality of evidence) (44), and North America at 32.6% (95% CI 16.9, 53.6; n = 12 studies, I 2 = 11.0%, moderate quality of evidence) (11,30,31,34–36,41,69–73). The stratified analyses results are summarized in Table 3 and the forest plot shown in Supplementary Figure 3, available on the Arthritis Care & Research website at https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.25157.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation