2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-020-04859-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical presentations and surgical outcomes of intraocular foreign body presenting to an ocular trauma unit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The patients' age was not associated with visual outcomes. We did not observe any association between wound location and visual outcome, which is consistent with the findings reported by Anguita et al [ 11 ]. The nature of the IOFBs and the absence or presence of concomitant traumatic cataract were unrelated to visual outcome also.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The patients' age was not associated with visual outcomes. We did not observe any association between wound location and visual outcome, which is consistent with the findings reported by Anguita et al [ 11 ]. The nature of the IOFBs and the absence or presence of concomitant traumatic cataract were unrelated to visual outcome also.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…IOFBs in the posterior segment have a greater tendency to damage the retina and can cause irreversible vision loss when the macula and papillomacular bundle are involved. However, Anguita et al adopted the opposite view, concluding that IOFB location was not significantly associated with visual outcome [ 11 ]. This view was based on the authors' observation that IOFBs in the posterior segment were mostly located in the vitreous cavity and did not cause retinal damage.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous study, we showed that the presence of IOFBs contributed to 21.4% of the rate of endophthalmitis [ 18 ]. IOFBs affect PTE prognosis in the following ways: (1) anatomical structure damage like PVR and retinal tear produced by IOFBs, (2) inflammatory chemistry of the IOFBs, and (3) carrier to deliver infectious agents [ 19 , 20 ]. Thus, we can conclude that the presence of IOFBs progresses the existing endophthalmitis and further adds difficulties to vitreous surgery, thereby contributing to worsening the prognosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intraocular foreign bodies are significant ocular injuries. They typically require emergent removal and antibiotics to prevent endophthalmitis and retinal detachments; however, newer evidence does suggest delaying surgery does not increase the risk for endophthalmitis or retinal detachments 1 . Intraocular foreign bodies with minimal vitreous penetration may be able to be removed carefully without concomitant vitrectomy and still achieve good anatomic results.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%