1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-8703(99)70080-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical predictors of heart failure in patients with first acute myocardial infarction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
40
1
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
40
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, as expected, a stepwise increase in absolute risk was found for AHF across the ACS spectrum with unstable angina patients, with AHF patients having an in-hospital mortality of 6.7% and myocardial infarction patients with AHF without and with ST-segment elevation incurring a 10.3% and 16.5% in-hospital mortality, respectively. Furthermore, the GRACE investigators confirm previous reports 10 that AHF develops in a sizeable number (5.6%) of patients after admission regardless of biomarker elevation or ST-segment deviation and is perhaps deadlier (17.8% versus 12.0% across all ACS, PϽ0.0001).…”
Section: See P 494supporting
confidence: 84%
“…Nonetheless, as expected, a stepwise increase in absolute risk was found for AHF across the ACS spectrum with unstable angina patients, with AHF patients having an in-hospital mortality of 6.7% and myocardial infarction patients with AHF without and with ST-segment elevation incurring a 10.3% and 16.5% in-hospital mortality, respectively. Furthermore, the GRACE investigators confirm previous reports 10 that AHF develops in a sizeable number (5.6%) of patients after admission regardless of biomarker elevation or ST-segment deviation and is perhaps deadlier (17.8% versus 12.0% across all ACS, PϽ0.0001).…”
Section: See P 494supporting
confidence: 84%
“…Nevertheless, to the best of our knowledge there are no studies examining the relationship between CRP levels and LVD when both of these factors were assessed on admission. Concerning the issue of the association between CRP and LVD after AMI, it has been demonstrated that the presence of a larger enzymatic infarct size and angiographically multiple complex lesions, both of which reflect the severity of the ongoing disease process, are associated with both the occurrence of HF and/ or CS [31][32][33] and increased levels of CRP 30,33,34) during the early phase of AMI. Of interest, several other factors related to a pre-existing medical condition, such as diabetes, hypertension, previous coronary heart disease (CHD), and MVD at angiography have also been shown to be associated with the occurrence of HF or CS after AMI, [35][36][37] but none of these factors are associated with increased CRP levels in this clinical setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has also been reported in one study that the amount of acute release of PAI-1 is significantly higher in AMI patients in Killip class ≥ 3 on admission than in those with a less severe presentation. 16) Concerning this last issue, among the factors associated with the occurrence of LVD after AMI, the presence of diabetes 45,46) and larger enzymatic infarct size 31,32) have also been shown to be associated with increased levels of PAI-1 in this setting. 10,13) Therefore, it is not possible to conclude that our finding of an association between higher PAI-1 levels and the occurrence of CS in AMI patients is merely due to a pre-existing medical condition or severity of the ongoing disease process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CHF problem is magnified in individuals with diabetes, in whom incidence rates are two to five times greater than those in the general population (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8). Nonetheless, heart failure has recently been termed "the frequent, forgotten, and often fatal complication of diabetes" (9), in part because estimates of the association between diabetes and CHF have been established primarily in studies that include diabetes as a potential risk factor in general populations (2,5,7,10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%