Clinical prediction rules for childhood urinary tract infections: a cross-sectional study in ambulatory care

Abstract

BackgroundDiagnosing childhood urinary tract infections (UTI) is challenging.AimValidate clinical prediction rules (UTIcalc, DUTY, Gorelick) for paediatric UTIs in primary care.Design & settingPost-hoc analysis of a cross-sectional study in 39 general practices and 2 emergency departments (Belgium, March 2019 to March 2020).MethodPhysicians recruited acutely ill children ≤18 years and sampled urine systematically for culture. Per rule, we performed an apparent validation; calculated sensitivities and specificities with 95%CI per threshold in the target group. For the DUTY coefficient-based algorithm, we performed a logistic calibration and calculated the Area Under the Curve with 95%CI.ResultsOf 834 children ≤18 years recruited, there were 297 children <5 years. The UTIcalc and Gorelick score had high to moderate sensitivity and low specificity (UTIcalc ≥2%) 75%; and 16% respectively; Gorelick (≥2 variables) 91%; and 8%. In contrast, the DUTY score ≥5 points had low sensitivity (8%), but high specificity (99%). Urine samples would be obtained in 72% vs 38% (UTIcalc), 92% vs 38% (Gorelick) or 1% vs 32% (DUTY) of children, compared to routine care. The number of missed infections per score was 1/4 (UTIcalc), 2/23 (Gorelick) and 24/26 (DUTY). The UTIcalc+ dipstick model had high sensitivity and specificity (100%; and 91%); resulting in no missed cases and 59% (95%CI 49%–68%) of antibiotics prescribed inappropriately.ConclusionIn this study, the UTIcalc and Gorelick score were useful for ruling out UTI but resulted in high urine sampling rates. The DUTY score had low sensitivity, meaning that 92% of UTIs would be missed.

Antibiotic Use for Common Infections in Pediatric Emergency Departments: A Narrative Review

“…A cross-sectional study evaluated the validity of these scores; both UTIcalc and Gorelick had high sensitivity at 75% and 98% respectively, but low specificity, 16% and 8% respectively, meaning these scores result in a low threshold to collect a urine sample, useful in children under two, where symptoms are usually nonspecific, but urine cultures are often negative. In contrast, the Duty score has a low sensitivity of 8% but high specificity of 99%, meaning it misses high numbers of children with UTIs because it uses variables more specific to symptomatic UTIs, which could be more useful in children older than two years old [118].…”