2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-77244-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Prediction Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
720
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,296 publications
(741 citation statements)
references
References 368 publications
2
720
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As FLI can also be interpreted as a predictive probability for hepatic steatosis, we assessed how wellcalibrated FLI was in our patient cohort using a calibration plot (27). To do so, we grouped patients into deciles based on measured FLI and within each decile calculated the proportion of patients with hepatic steatosis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As FLI can also be interpreted as a predictive probability for hepatic steatosis, we assessed how wellcalibrated FLI was in our patient cohort using a calibration plot (27). To do so, we grouped patients into deciles based on measured FLI and within each decile calculated the proportion of patients with hepatic steatosis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Missing vital sign and laboratory data are not missing at random-missing implies healthier-thus, usual imputation techniques were not applied. 37,38 The imputation method was intentionally chosen to be a conservative approach, more likely to attenuate effect estimates. Other data analysis tactics could have been used; however, we emphasize that the final prediction model only endorses data patterns independently observed in both the development and validation sets, which lend credibility to their veracity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…37,38 Linear regression modeling was used and a forward stepwise variable selection algorithm applied in order to identify the strongest independent predictors of continuous TTR. 38,39 All models generated during the variable selection process were reviewed closely for collinearity and adjustments made as needed.…”
Section: Analytic Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is no plausible mechanism that explains why these variables have such an impact on the probability of success. Furthermore, rather than choosing predictors based on observed significant relations to outcome variables in the same dataset, contemporary methodological guidelines for prediction research state that predictors should be chosen based on preselection 4 , a method that results in higher external validity and less overfitting. Therefore, we would like to emphasize the importance of external validation of these predictors in other data.…”
Section: Re: Predicting Successful Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Sectimentioning
confidence: 99%