2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2015.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Practice Patterns in Chemotherapeutic Treatment Regimens for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, in the US, the most common third line treatment regimens are EGFR-containing therapies, such as combination of cetuximab and irinotecan, panitumumab or cetuximab monotherapy [15]. In other countries, such as Canada, although oxaliplatin and irinotecan were also the most common chemotherapy backbones for firstand second-line, chemotherapy was usually not used alone [17,18]. This may imply poor treatment outcomes of targeted therapy in late lines, and a lack of consensus on both the timing and options for third-line treatment during the study period (2011)(2012)(2013)(2014)(2015)(2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, in the US, the most common third line treatment regimens are EGFR-containing therapies, such as combination of cetuximab and irinotecan, panitumumab or cetuximab monotherapy [15]. In other countries, such as Canada, although oxaliplatin and irinotecan were also the most common chemotherapy backbones for firstand second-line, chemotherapy was usually not used alone [17,18]. This may imply poor treatment outcomes of targeted therapy in late lines, and a lack of consensus on both the timing and options for third-line treatment during the study period (2011)(2012)(2013)(2014)(2015)(2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As multiple chemotherapeutic and targeted biologic agents emerged, treatment patterns and sequences for mCRC patients have significantly evolved over the past decade [12]. Several studies have reported the complex and changing treatment pattern among mCRC patients in the United States [13][14][15][16], Canada [17], and some European countries [18,19]. However, there is a lack of key real-world evidence on the clinical characteristics and treatment patterns of CRC/mCRC patients in China.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy is generally considered as the first-line treatment for advanced CRC [35]. Response rates to 5-FU treatment are between 10–20% in the advanced CRC [36], and a better response rate has been reported using combined chemotherapy regimens of 5-FU and oxaliplatin which is 40–50% [37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While surgical resection at early stages may lead to complete eradication of tumors, CRC at advanced stages requires systemic chemotherapy and/or irradiation . In addition to cytotoxic reagents, some molecularly targeted drugs such as angiogenesis inhibitors (bevacizumab and ramucirumab), anti‐EGFR antibodies (cetuximab and panitumumab) and multi‐kinase inhibitors (regorafenib) are currently used for CRC treatments …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%