The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2002
DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200206000-00040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical practice parameters for hemodynamic support of pediatric and neonatal patients in septic shock*

Abstract: American College of Critical Care Medicine adult guidelines for hemodynamic support of septic shock have little application to the management of pediatric or neonatal septic shock. Studies are required to determine whether American College of Critical Care Medicine guidelines for hemodynamic support of pediatric and neonatal septic shock will be implemented and associated with improved outcome.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
411
3
27

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 590 publications
(445 citation statements)
references
References 130 publications
4
411
3
27
Order By: Relevance
“…Primary endpoint was the resolution of shock in either arm as determined by proportions attaining locally-adapted American College of Critical Care Medicine/Paediatric Advanced Life Support (ACCM/PALS) therapeutic (resuscitation) end points (here called resuscitation targets) at 8 hours [20,21]. Attainment of resuscitation targets was defined as the absence of all of the following features: severe tachycardia (>180 beats/minute if aged <12months, > 160 beats/minute if aged 1-5years or >140 beats/minute if aged ≥ 5 years); hypoxia (oxygen saturation <95%); hypotension: systolic blood pressure (SBP) (<70mmHg for <12 months and <80mmHg for > 1 year) or delayed capillary refill time (CRT) (≥3seconds).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primary endpoint was the resolution of shock in either arm as determined by proportions attaining locally-adapted American College of Critical Care Medicine/Paediatric Advanced Life Support (ACCM/PALS) therapeutic (resuscitation) end points (here called resuscitation targets) at 8 hours [20,21]. Attainment of resuscitation targets was defined as the absence of all of the following features: severe tachycardia (>180 beats/minute if aged <12months, > 160 beats/minute if aged 1-5years or >140 beats/minute if aged ≥ 5 years); hypoxia (oxygen saturation <95%); hypotension: systolic blood pressure (SBP) (<70mmHg for <12 months and <80mmHg for > 1 year) or delayed capillary refill time (CRT) (≥3seconds).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Severe disease was defined as a GMSPS of 8 or higher. Septic shock was defined as confirmed infection with clinical signs of decreased perfusion despite adequate volume replacement, and one or more signs of impaired perfusion (lactate >2 mmol/l, capillary refill greater than 2 s, base deficit >−5, decreased mental status or decreased urine output) [11,12]. Severe disease without septic shock refers to children with a GMSPS of 8 or higher but who did not have signs of septic shock.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sin embargo, si persiste el shock, su respuesta hemodinámica es distinta a la descrita en adultos caracterizándose por un bajo gasto cardíaco (GC), hipodébito y elevada resistencia vascular, de manera que es la disponibilidad de oxígeno (oxygen delivery, DO 2 ) y no su extracción (oxygen consumption, [VO 2 ]/DO 2 ), el principal determinante del consumo de oxí-geno. Aproximadamente el 50% de los niños presentan este patrón hemodinámico el cual es conocido como SS frío [6][7][8] .…”
Section: Diferencias Del Shock Séptico En Población Infantil Y Adultaunclassified