2015
DOI: 10.1159/000367730
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Differ between Japan, United States, and Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rationale for this strategy is that imaging criteria is considered sufficient in most cases (8).…”
Section: Discussion Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rationale for this strategy is that imaging criteria is considered sufficient in most cases (8).…”
Section: Discussion Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This unique approach has arisen because the indocyanine green retention test is frequently performed before surgical resection in Japan. In that sense, liver damage is more of an HCC-oriented liver functional reserve classification than Child-Pugh classification, where the latter was originally developed to predict the prognosis of cirrhotic patients [12,13]. …”
Section: General Rules For the Clinical And Pathological Study Of Primentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in other countries, the clinical guidelines for HCC, such as those issued by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) [5] and the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) [6], do not recommend the use of PIVKA-II or AFP-L3 in daily clinical practice. Even AFP is not recommended for the surveillance of liver cancer because of its low sensitivity and specificity, that is, due to its poor cost effectiveness, leaving ultrasound (US) as the only screening method recommended per the Western guidelines [7]. This signifies a huge difference in the way of thinking between researchers in Japan and those in Western countries.…”
Section: Tumor Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%