2017
DOI: 10.1177/0194599817722550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Practice Guideline: Evaluation of the Neck Mass in Adults

Abstract: Objective Neck masses are common in adults, but often the underlying etiology is not easily identifiable. While infections cause most of the neck masses in children, most persistent neck masses in adults are neoplasms. Malignant neoplasms far exceed any other etiology of adult neck mass. Importantly, an asymptomatic neck mass may be the initial or only clinically apparent manifestation of head and neck cancer, such as squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), lymphoma, thyroid, or salivary gland cancer. Evidence sugges… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
140
1
40

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(183 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
2
140
1
40
Order By: Relevance
“…The American Family Physician , UptoDate (Wolters Kluwer Health, Waltham, MA), and others suggest antibiotic trial for acute and subacute cervical lymphadenopathy . This recommendation contrasts the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (AAO–HNS) recently developed clinical practice guidelines for the evaluation of the adult neck mass, which specifically recommend against empiric antibiotics . Due to the difficulty in distinguishing reactive from metastatic lymph nodes, more research should be done to define the risk factors for malignancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The American Family Physician , UptoDate (Wolters Kluwer Health, Waltham, MA), and others suggest antibiotic trial for acute and subacute cervical lymphadenopathy . This recommendation contrasts the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (AAO–HNS) recently developed clinical practice guidelines for the evaluation of the adult neck mass, which specifically recommend against empiric antibiotics . Due to the difficulty in distinguishing reactive from metastatic lymph nodes, more research should be done to define the risk factors for malignancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The otolaryngologist performed flexible endoscopy in 82% of patients at the first visit, reflecting adherence to the new AAO–HNS guideline recommendation for a targeted physical examination “including visualizing the mucosa of the larynx, base of tongue, and pharynx.” 26(S‐2) A small number of patients underwent mirror exam, and these exams were not specifically analyzed in our study. The importance of adequate examination of the pharyngeal axis is underscored by the fact that 40% of OPSCC cases occurred in the base of the tongue, which cannot be visualized well transorally.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a wide spectrum encompassing infectious to neoplastic conditions with various underlying etiologies. Many structures such as lymph nodes, salivary glands and thyroid are easily accessible and provide a specific set of lesions with possible differential diagnoses . FNAC is broadly adopted as a longstanding tool for the diagnosis and the planning of an effective treatment of head and neck masses .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many structures such as lymph nodes, salivary glands and thyroid are easily accessible and provide a specific set of lesions with possible differential diagnoses. 1 FNAC is broadly adopted as a longstanding tool for the diagnosis and the planning of an effective treatment of head and neck masses. 2 Nevertheless, its sensitivity and specificity reporting in the literature are widely variable and mainly depend on the site of the mass.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The purpose of the summary is to convey key concepts and recommendations from the guideline in clear, understandable, patientfriendly language. It was developed by consumers, clinicians, and AAO-HNSF staff.…”
Section: How Was This Summary Developed?mentioning
confidence: 99%