2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.08.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Policy: Neuroimaging and Decisionmaking in Adult Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in the Acute Setting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
189
1
10

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 432 publications
(202 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
2
189
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…However, our clinicians were not informed that the CDS was part of a research study. Second, it is possible that our observed decline in imaging use may not be solely due to our intervention but also confounders, such as increased public awareness of harm associated with inappropriate imaging and the publication of a related American College of Emergency Physicians' clinical policy during the study period [11]. However, no change in imaging use was observed in the control cohort, supporting previous findings that guideline publication alone may be a weak intervention for changing clinical practice [36].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, our clinicians were not informed that the CDS was part of a research study. Second, it is possible that our observed decline in imaging use may not be solely due to our intervention but also confounders, such as increased public awareness of harm associated with inappropriate imaging and the publication of a related American College of Emergency Physicians' clinical policy during the study period [11]. However, no change in imaging use was observed in the control cohort, supporting previous findings that guideline publication alone may be a weak intervention for changing clinical practice [36].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…When used appropriately, they can help avoid unnecessary head CTs, without jeopardizing patient safety [6]. Despite their potential utility [7][8][9][10] and acceptance by professional societies [11], their clinical adoption remains scarce. It is estimated that 10% to 35% of CTs obtained in the ED for MTBI are not recommended according to the guidelines [12], and head CT utilization varies significantly both nationwide and within institutions [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CT is currently the only imaging modality for which there is class I evidence to support use in routine clinical practice, 4 and only in a limited population. 5,6 However, a growing body of evidence indicates that subtle injuries to the brain structure go undetected with CT in patients with mild TBI (mTBI).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As stated in current guidelines discussing head injury and warfarin use, liberal CT scanning of the head seems to be a reasonable strategy, even for those who present with normal mental status and a GCS score of 15. [10][11][12][13] The risk of delayed bleeding appears to be very close to zero with clopidogrel, suggesting that routine hospitalization and follow-up scanning might not be necessary. Patients taking warfarin are not without risk and probably do require follow-up but not necessarily routine (second) CT.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%