2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-018-2746-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical performance of precoated brackets and self-etch bonding technique: a prospective comparative study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, specimens with BARI scores of 5 were investigated using SEM-EDS. They were chosen because this kind of adhesive failure is particularly dangerous for the enamel structure [6,7,11,23,35,36]. Although during macroscopic observation, no adhesive on the bracket base was detected, the SEM images showed not only the microstructure of the bracket base but also the presence of adhesive remnants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study, specimens with BARI scores of 5 were investigated using SEM-EDS. They were chosen because this kind of adhesive failure is particularly dangerous for the enamel structure [6,7,11,23,35,36]. Although during macroscopic observation, no adhesive on the bracket base was detected, the SEM images showed not only the microstructure of the bracket base but also the presence of adhesive remnants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first APC orthodontic brackets were introduced in 1991 (Mini Unitwin, 3M, Unitek) [4,6,7]. At that time, such ready-to-use brackets with the bases covered with a composite were chemically cured on the enamel using orthodontic adhesives (two-paste systems), which was a huge step forward in improving the bonding procedure [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enamel etching with a laser can produce acceptable bond strengths but is associated with a fractured, grooved enamel surfaces and abundant AR post bracket debonding comparable to that of the CAE approach [5], whereas RMGIC leaves minimal AR and enamel damage but is associated with inadequate bracket retention [12]. On the other hand, self-etching primers (SEPs) provide simultaneous etching and priming functions, which is more convenient for both the clinician and patient due to chairside time savings and reliable bond strengths [13,14]. However, there is debate as to whether the amount of adhesive left after debonding is less than or the same as that of the CAE technique, and enamel damage after bracket debonding could not be eliminated [4,15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resin adhesive at the bracket-enamel interface is constantly loaded by the forces applied by orthodontic wires and thus a viscoelastic deformation is anticipated. Although there is no, until today, clinically based evidence, creep may be associated with bracket debonding [ 14 , 15 ]. On the other hand, in fixed retainers, orthodontic adhesives are constantly loaded by the tensile properties exerted by orthodontic wire and thus viscoelastic deformation is also anticipated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%