Clinical performance of porcelain laminate veneers for up to 20 years

Beier, Ulrike Stephanie; Kapferer, Ines; Burtscher, Doris; Dumfahrt, Herbert

doi:10.1016/s0022-3913(12)60047-x

Cited by 57 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The remaining 14.3% and 11.2% reported had veneers for four to five years and more than years, respectively. In a retrospective clinical study, Beier et al [10] reported a five-year survival rate of 94.4% and a 10-year survival rate of 93.5%. Similar findings were reported in a randomized clinical trial by Layton and Walton [11].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Patient Awareness of Soft-Tissue Irritants After Placement of Porcelain Laminate Veneers

Dhaifullah¹,

Zarnoog²,

Muqaybil³

et al. 2022

Cureus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundPorcelain is considered the most esthetic and biocompatible material in dentistry with the ability to imitate sound enamel. Research into porcelain laminate veneers has focused mainly on technical or aesthetic aspects, rather than the reaction of the surrounding soft tissues. This study aims to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and practice regarding patient maintenance of soft-tissue alternation occurring after the placement of veneers. MethodologyA descriptive, cross-sectional survey was chosen for this study to identify patient gingival alternation that occurred after the placement of veneers. Statistical analysis was performed using R version 3.6.3. Counts and percentages were used to summarize the study variables. The chi-square test was used to assess the association between categorical variables. Adverse events included hyperplasia, gum recession, change in color, change in taste/smell, toothache, and redness. Spearman's correlation was used to assess the association between hygiene, awareness, and the number of adverse events experienced after installing the veneers. Hypothesis testing was performed at a 5% level of significance. ResultsThe study questionnaire was completed by 98 respondents. Males and females represented 34.7% and 65.3% of the study sample, respectively. One-half (53.1%) of the respondents were 30-40 years old, and onequarter were 41-50 years old. Only one-half of the respondents were satisfied with the final result after installing the veneers (53.1%). Satisfaction was not significantly different between males and females (p = 0.818). Results showed better awareness and dental hygiene in females. Only 11.8% of the males reported visiting the dentist due to gingival problems before installing the veneers compared to 35.9% of the females (p = 0.021). The most common problems reported by the respondents were hyperplasia (62.2%) and a change in smell/taste (66.3%). Other common problems included color change (58.2%), toothache (59.2%), and redness (55.1%). Satisfaction was significantly higher in patients who did not experience gingival hyperplasia (70.3%) than in those who did (42.6%). Experiencing toothache and redness in the gums surrounding the lenses were associated with lower satisfaction (p < 0.001). The use of antibiotics was not associated with satisfaction (p = 0.495). ConclusionsOur study indicated a low level of awareness and satisfaction with porcelain laminate veneer placement. There was a statistically significant association between dental hygiene and awareness scores. Dental hygiene was also positively associated with satisfaction with dental veneers. A lower awareness score was associated with lower satisfaction. Further, higher awareness was associated with higher satisfaction.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Patient Awareness of Soft-Tissue Irritants After Placement of Porcelain Laminate Veneers

Dhaifullah¹,

Zarnoog²,

Muqaybil³

et al. 2022

Cureus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Nowadays, ceramic laminate veneers are one of the main choices to perform a highly aesthetic oral rehabilitation [1][2][3]. Feldspathic porcelain, the first type of ceramic used in dentistry, is a suitable clinical solution for fabricating veneers, due to excellent esthetic and biocompatibility properties and long-lasting performance [1][2][3][4]. Long-term success of ceramic veneers depends partly on the adhesive cementation [4,5].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effect of Feldspathic Thickness on Fluorescence of a Variety of Resin Cements and Flowable Composites

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

(1) Background: The shade of resin-based materials and ceramic thickness influence the optical color of laminate restorations. The purpose of this study is to evaluate—in vitro—the effect of resin-based cement shade and ceramic thickness on fluorescence of feldspathic laminate veneers; (2) Methods: 180 samples of feldspathic ceramic A2 shade with two different thicknesses (0.5 and 0.8 mm) were obtained. The samples were cemented to composite resin substrates with one of the following materials in different shades (n = 10): resin cement (Variolink Esthetic in Light, Neutral and Warm shades; or RelyX Veneer in B0.5 /white, Translucent and A3 Opaque/yellow opaque shades); flowable composite resin (G-aenial Flo in A2 and A3 shades) or a pre-heated composite resin (Filtek Supreme XTE, A3 body shade). The fluorescence spectra were obtained by means of a spectrofluorometer. Two-way ANOVA, Tukey, and Student’s t-tests were performed (α = 0.05); (3) Results: Fluorescence values were significantly influenced by the resin-based agent tested (p < 0.001), the thickness of ceramic (p < 0.001), and their interaction (p < 0.001). The lowest fluorescence values were achieved by RelyX Veneer resin cement regardless its shade and the ceramic thickness; (4) Conclusions: both the shade of resin-based agent and the feldspathic ceramic thickness influenced the fluorescence of laminate restorations.

show abstract

“…Accordingly, 63% to 72% by weight of coronal structure can be lost when preparing an anterior tooth for a crown. This increases the risk of pulp exposure, thus compromising vitality and biomechanical integrity [9].Ceramic laminate veneers are a minimally invasive treatment that has been extensively used in the anterior region because of its esthetic advantages and long-term success [10][11][12][13][14][15]. Conventional ceramic veneers require a minimum reduction of 0.3 to 0.5 mm, to achieve sufficient thickness for ceramic restoration [16,17].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Ceramic laminate veneers are a minimally invasive treatment that has been extensively used in the anterior region because of its esthetic advantages and long-term success [10][11][12][13][14][15]. Conventional ceramic veneers require a minimum reduction of 0.3 to 0.5 mm, to achieve sufficient thickness for ceramic restoration [16,17].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

8-year multicenter retrospective study on partial laminate veneers

Durán

Oosterhaven

et al. 2023

J Prosthodont Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The continuous improvement in adhesive technologies has allowed the development of diverse, minimally invasive treatment alternatives. In the anterior region, several causes can lead to the need for restoration, including decay; structurally compromised teeth due to fractures and trauma; morphological corrections (e.g., diastema and conoid teeth), or misaligned teeth [1,2]. Restorative approaches in the anterior region range from minimal intervention using direct resin composites to more invasive procedures using indirect laminate veneers or full crowns [3][4][5][6].Current trends in dentistry seek the maximum preservation of sound tooth structures [7]. Full crowns depart from these conservative principles, since they require the removal of a considerable amount of healthy tissue, including most of the remnant enamel, from the tooth preparation surface in dentin [8]. Accordingly, 63% to 72% by weight of coronal structure can be lost when preparing an anterior tooth for a crown. This increases the risk of pulp exposure, thus compromising vitality and biomechanical integrity [9].Ceramic laminate veneers are a minimally invasive treatment that has been extensively used in the anterior region because of its esthetic advantages and long-term success [10][11][12][13][14][15]. Conventional ceramic veneers require a minimum reduction of 0.3 to 0.5 mm, to achieve sufficient thickness for ceramic restoration [16,17]. However, a larger enamel reduction may be needed depending on esthetic requirements. For instance, a 0.8 to 1.2 mm preparation is needed in darkened teeth to obtain the correct color integration of the ceramic restoration [18,19].

show abstract

Clinical performance of porcelain laminate veneers for up to 20 years

Cited by 57 publications

References 0 publications

Patient Awareness of Soft-Tissue Irritants After Placement of Porcelain Laminate Veneers

Patient Awareness of Soft-Tissue Irritants After Placement of Porcelain Laminate Veneers

The Effect of Feldspathic Thickness on Fluorescence of a Variety of Resin Cements and Flowable Composites

8-year multicenter retrospective study on partial laminate veneers

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About