Clinical performance of CEREC AC Bluecam conservative ceramic restorations after five years—A retrospective study

Nejatidanesh, Farahnaz; Amjadi, Mehrak; Akouchekian, Mansoureh; Savabi, Omid

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2015.07.006

Cited by 44 publications

(34 citation statements)

References 19 publications

(40 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Alumina or zirconia crystalline ceramics are available in powder form (stratification and densely sintered) or blocks (CAD/CAM). Indirect composites restorations are fabricated by means of chemical, heat, light cure, or from blocks (CAD/CAM) …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…CAD/CAM technology is a great three‐dimensional (3D) innovation used to machine prefabricated blocks to build a substructure stratified with porcelains or glass‐ceramics, or monolithic restorations characterized by external stains …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Restorations survival rates fabricated with different materials are still a frequent topic in primary studies . In dental prosthesis, there is still a lack of randomized clinical studies.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Indirect composites restorations are fabricated by means of chemical, heat, light cure, or from blocks (CAD/CAM). 2,[8][9][10][11][12] CAD/CAM technology is a great three-dimensional (3D) innovation used to machine prefabricated blocks to build a substructure stratified with porcelains or glass-ceramics, or monolithic restorations characterized by external stains. 10,11,13,15 Sequential layers stratification with different high-or low-fusing ceramics, translucence/opacity degrees, and fluorescent-, opalescent-, and translucent-like effects, make possible to fabricate esthetic ceramic restorations with an excellent naturalness.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Effects of manufacturing methods on the survival rate of ceramic and indirect composite restorations: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Sampaio

Özcan

Gimenez

et al. 2019

J Esthet Restor Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives To evaluate the survival rate of ceramic and indirect composite inlays, onlays, and overlays manufactured according to different methods (CAD/CAM, pressable, and stratified). MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for published articles. Risk of bias, data extraction, subgroup analysis, meta‐analysis, and GRADE was performed. Materials and methods Prospective, retrospective, or RCT studies, without restriction of language, from 1983 to 2019, with follow‐up ≥5 years, reporting survival rates were screened independently by two reviewers in accordance with eligibility criteria. Results A total of 13 articles (12 for ceramic, one for indirect composite) met the inclusion criteria. No articles were included regarding crystalline ceramic. The estimated cumulative survival rate for CAD/CAM was 97% after 5 years and 89% after 10 years; for pressable was 95% after 5 years, and for stratified was 88% after 5 years and 93% after 10 years. Conclusions Regardless of the manufacturing method, vitreous ceramic inlays, onlays, and overlays showed high survival, providing evidence that these restorations are a safe treatment. Clinical relevance Vitreous ceramic inlays, onlays, and overlays showed high survival, regardless of the manufacturing method, providing evidence that these restorations are a safe treatment.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Restorations survival rates fabricated with different materials are still a frequent topic in primary studies . In dental prosthesis, there is still a lack of randomized clinical studies.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Effects of manufacturing methods on the survival rate of ceramic and indirect composite restorations: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Sampaio

Özcan

Gimenez

et al. 2019

J Esthet Restor Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Polymerization shrinkage and marginal adaptation are still critical problems of traditional directly placed composite restorative materials . Many practitioners choose CAD/CAM restoratives because of the esthetic demands of patients, and the price of CAD/CAM resin blocks is achievable compared with other full‐ceramic and zirconia materials . CAD/CAM resin blocks also provide enhanced mechanical and physical properties compared with conventional composites because they are highly polymerized, thus a greater degree of conversion with less residual monomer is possible .…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Microtensile Bond Strength of CAD/CAM Resin Blocks to Dual‐Cure Adhesive Cement: The Effect of Different Sandblasting Procedures

Tekçe

Tuncer

Demırcı

et al. 2018

Journal of Prosthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Marginal and internal fit and fracture resistance of three‐unit provisional restorations fabricated by additive, subtractive, and conventional methods

Falahchai

Rahimabadi

Khabazkar

et al. 2022

Clinical & Exp Dental Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: To compare the marginal and internal fit and fracture resistance of three-unit provisional fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) fabricated by additive, subtractive, and conventional methods. Material and Methods: Eighty 3-unit FDPs were fabricated on metal dies of the maxillary right second premolar and second molar by four different techniques (n = 20):The direct method by using autopolymerizing polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), indirect method by the compression molding technique, subtractive manufacturing by using PMMA blocks, and additive manufacturing by using digital light processing technology.The adaptation of restorations at the marginal, axial, cuspal, and fossa areas was assessed by using the silicone replica technique. After thermocycling and cyclic loading, the fracture resistance was measured by a universal testing machine. Data were analyzed by a twoway analysis of variance (ANOVA), ANOVA, and Tukey test (α = .05). Results:The mean gap measured in the additive group was lower than that in all other groups at all points (p < .05); however, the difference in the marginal gap with the subtractive group was not significant (p = .995). The mean marginal and axial gaps in the subtractive group were significantly lower than the corresponding values in both conventional groups (p < .05). A significant difference existed between all groups regarding the mean cuspal and fossa gaps (p < .05). The mean fracture resistance of the additive group was significantly higher than that of indirect (p = .018) and direct (p < .001) groups, and the fracture resistance of the subtractive group was significantly higher than that of the direct group (p = .020). Conclusion:The digitally fabricated provisional FDPs showed superior marginal and internal fit and higher fracture resistance than the conventionally fabricated FDPs.Between the digital methods, the additive technique yielded superior internal fit.

show abstract

Clinical performance of CEREC AC Bluecam conservative ceramic restorations after five years—A retrospective study

Cited by 44 publications

References 19 publications

Effects of manufacturing methods on the survival rate of ceramic and indirect composite restorations: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Effects of manufacturing methods on the survival rate of ceramic and indirect composite restorations: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Microtensile Bond Strength of CAD/CAM Resin Blocks to Dual‐Cure Adhesive Cement: The Effect of Different Sandblasting Procedures

Marginal and internal fit and fracture resistance of three‐unit provisional restorations fabricated by additive, subtractive, and conventional methods

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About