2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.03.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical performance of cardiac Troponin I: A comparison between the POCT AQT90 FLEX and the Dimension Vista analyzer in an emergency setting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The assay is optimized on an automated platform (Dimension Vista System; Siemens Healthineers). In our laboratory, the range encompassing the 99th percentile corresponded to that reported by the manufacturer , being 0.000–0.045 ng/mL. The analytical sensitivity corresponds to 0.015 ng/mL and the functional sensitivity to 0.040 ng/mL.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The assay is optimized on an automated platform (Dimension Vista System; Siemens Healthineers). In our laboratory, the range encompassing the 99th percentile corresponded to that reported by the manufacturer , being 0.000–0.045 ng/mL. The analytical sensitivity corresponds to 0.015 ng/mL and the functional sensitivity to 0.040 ng/mL.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…For cTnT assays, the between-assays correlation is excellent, and strength of agreement is substantial. Our results are in accordance with those of the literature, as observed between cTnI-Vista and cTnI-AQT [14] . They highlight the fact that each cTn assay has individual analytical characteristics, and that the results are not fully transferable from one assay to another [15] , [16] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…This specificity was significantly superior to a single measurement strategy for HS-assays, cTnI-Pathfast, cTnI-Ultra and cTnI-Vista. Our results are comparable to those in the literature when considering HS assays [6] , [17] , [18] , [22] , [30] , but also cTnI Access, cTnI-Vista, cTnI-Vitros, cTnI-AQT [5] , [7] , [14] , [30] , and cTnT-AQT [19] , [30] , although comparison is limited because of the sample size of the population and study protocols (some data in the literature is reported for H0-H2). Moreover, the percentage of rule-out patients with these H0-H3 strategies is elevated for all assays.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…A previously undertaken study by Meon et al and Herbert et al in a similar setting has reported the acceptable precision of the AQT 90 Flex analyzer considering the stringent <10% CV goal. The results of this study with a CV of 2.4% with mean cTn-I of 2.15 ± 0.05 ng/ml are in concordance with the literature [17-18]. Furthermore, the assay demonstrated acceptable linearity covering a range from 0.034 to 1.316 ng/ml to ensure a reliable clinical utility to rule out or rule in ACS.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%