Clinical Performance of a Glass Hybrid Restorative in Extended Size Class 2 Preparations

Kütük, Zeynep Bilge; Öztürk, Canan; Soleimani, Reza; Çakır, Filiz Yalçın; Gürgan, Sevil

doi:10.5336/dentalsci.2019-64892

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Posterior resin composite and Equia Forte in class II cavities, color compatibility progressively improved. 21 In the other study, when the color match parameter is examined; it has been reported that Equia material matures and its translucency improves as time passes. Since the current study covers 12 months, it is thought that color match may increase or decrease in the following years; for this, long-term follow-ups are needed.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 96%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Could bulk fill glass hybrid restorative materials replace composite resins in treating permanent teeth? A randomized controlled clinical trial

Uyumaz,

Abaklı İnci,

Özer

2023

J Esthet Restor Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveThis study aims to compare the clinical and radiographic efficacy of Equia system bulk fill glass hybrid material with composite resins in the permanent restoration of pediatric patients' permanent teeth.Materials and MethodsThe study included 44 pediatric patients aged 8–16 who applied to Necmettin Erbakan University Pediatric Dentistry Department. The groups were formed as symmetrical teeth in the same patient using the split‐mouth design. The study included class I caries lesions of 144 permanent teeth. Group 1 was restored with the Equia system bulk fill glass hybrid material (Equia Forte HT + Equia Forte Coat [GC, Co, Tokyo, Japan]) (n = 72) and Group 2 with the Charisma Smart universal composite resin (Kulzer, Gmbh, Hanau, Germany) + Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray, Noritake, Sakazu, Okayama) (n = 72). Evaluations were performed clinically and radiographically by two physicians in 2nd week, 3rd month, 6th month, and 12th month and the results were recorded. Clinical evaluation was carried out using modified‐USPHS criteria. Obtained data were statistically analyzed using Kendall's W test and Cochran's Q test for the comparison within the group, and the Chi‐square test for the comparison between groups.ResultsAmong the materials utilized in the study, there was no statistically significant difference in marginal adaptation, marginal discoloration, retention, anatomical form, postoperative sensitivity, and secondary caries according (p > 0.05). Group 2 outperformed statistically significant Group 1 in terms of color match in all periods (p < 0.05). While there was no statistically significant difference in surface structure between the groups in 2nd week and 3rd month (p > 0.05), there was a statistically substantial difference in 6th, and 12th months (p < 0.05). No secondary caries or periapical lesions were found in any restorations during radiographic evaluation.ConclusionAfter a year, the clinical performance of both Equia and composite resins was equivalent and successful in the majority of the measures against which they were evaluated.Clinical SignificanceBased on the results of the research, Equia system bulk fill glass hybrid restorations are considered a viable alternative to composite resins in class I permanent teeth restorations.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 96%

“…According to a study assessing the clinical performance of Geanial Posterior resin composite and Equia Forte in class II cavities, color compatibility progressively improved 21 . In the other study, when the color match parameter is examined; it has been reported that Equia material matures and its translucency improves as time passes.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%