2003
DOI: 10.1117/12.480250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical performance of a 14-in. x 14-in. real-time amorphous selenium flat-panel detector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have reported, since 2000, continuous progress in the development of real-time a-Se flat panel detectors 1,2,3,4 starting from prototype to production products. Based on a multilayer PIN type a-Se structure deposited on a 150 µm pixel pitch thin film transistor (TFT) array, active areas of FPD9 and FPD14 are respectively 23x23 cm 2 and 34.5x34.5 cm 2 corresponding to 1536x1536 and 2304x2304 pixels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have reported, since 2000, continuous progress in the development of real-time a-Se flat panel detectors 1,2,3,4 starting from prototype to production products. Based on a multilayer PIN type a-Se structure deposited on a 150 µm pixel pitch thin film transistor (TFT) array, active areas of FPD9 and FPD14 are respectively 23x23 cm 2 and 34.5x34.5 cm 2 corresponding to 1536x1536 and 2304x2304 pixels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was observed as a deviation from the ideal linear behavior of SNR versus detector entrance exposure at lower exposures such as those used in fluoroscopic procedures. Similar to Roos, several other authors have used an approach of plotting SNR versus exposure to determine an approximate threshold exposure (Suzuki et al 2002, Tousignant et al 2003). Various other methods have also been used in an attempt to determine the x-ray quantum-limited range of exposures including measuring the dark-field NPS to determine the electronic noise level and comparing this to the total noise at zero spatial frequency, with the anisotropic ASIC noise and the electronic noise subtracted as a function of exposure (Hunt et al 2004) and by examining the exposure at which the zero-frequency DQE drops to one-half its high dose value (Hunt et al 2003, Zhao et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The motion of these free charge carriers induces imaging signal in the pixels. The numerous advantages of AMFPIs (real-time readout, compact profile, superior image quality, etc) have led to their widespread acceptance in an increasing number of medical applications, including radiography, fluoroscopy, cardiac imaging, mammography and radiotherapy imaging (Antonuk 2002, Granfors et al 2001, Colbeth et al 2001, Ikeda et al 2003, Samei and Flynn 2003, Vedantham et al 2000, Tousignant et al 2003.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%