2022
DOI: 10.1186/s12876-022-02361-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical-pathological characteristics and prognostic factors for malignant peritoneal mesothelioma in the elderly

Abstract: Background Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare disease characterized by atypical symptoms, difficult diagnosis, variable course and poor prognosis, and it develops mainly in elderly individuals. The authors aimed to identify the clinical-pathological characteristics, prognosis, and prognostic factors in elderly MPM patients. Methods From the National Cancer Institute Surveillance Epidemiology End Results (SEER) database, 1492 patients… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further multifactorial Cox analysis revealed that TNM stage (stage III-IV), tumor hypofractionation, presence of lymph node metastasis, and DACH1 methylation may all increase the risk of radiation therapy insensitivity and poor prognosis in esophageal cancer patients, suggesting that the methylation status of DACH1 may be used as a predictor of chemotherapy sensitivity and prognosis in esophageal cancer, which may be related to the inhibition of transforming DACH1 by methylation This may be related to the fact that the methylated DACH1 inhibits the transmission of the transforming growth factor- β signaling pathway, resulting in the downregulation of the expression of downstream signaling target molecules, which in turn fails to regulate the expression of factors that promote cell division and proliferation [ 20 ]. However, the exact mechanism of the effect needs to be confirmed by further in-depth studies and verified in clinical practice [ 21 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further multifactorial Cox analysis revealed that TNM stage (stage III-IV), tumor hypofractionation, presence of lymph node metastasis, and DACH1 methylation may all increase the risk of radiation therapy insensitivity and poor prognosis in esophageal cancer patients, suggesting that the methylation status of DACH1 may be used as a predictor of chemotherapy sensitivity and prognosis in esophageal cancer, which may be related to the inhibition of transforming DACH1 by methylation This may be related to the fact that the methylated DACH1 inhibits the transmission of the transforming growth factor- β signaling pathway, resulting in the downregulation of the expression of downstream signaling target molecules, which in turn fails to regulate the expression of factors that promote cell division and proliferation [ 20 ]. However, the exact mechanism of the effect needs to be confirmed by further in-depth studies and verified in clinical practice [ 21 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pathological review remains difficult and should be performed by an expert pathologist to ensure accurate diagnosis 7, 28 . Histological subtype and nuclear grade have been shown to be independent predictors for patient outcomes, therefore these determinations are imperative for proper patient assessment 9, 29, 30 . In addition, immunohistochemistry (IHC) for Ki-67, programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1), and anaplastic lymphoma kinas (ALK) translocation is recommended, as these markers have also been associated with patient outcomes and may influence treatment recommendations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intermediate-Risk designation comprises patients with similar histology but with patient factors associated with more aggressive disease. These patients are typically of male sex and at least 75 years old, patient prognostic factors associated with overall worse survival 4, 29, 73, 75, 87, 91 . Preoperative baseline thrombocytosis has been established as a poor prognostic marker associated with decreased overall survival 67, 78, 92 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation