The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1990
DOI: 10.1016/0090-8258(90)90085-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical-pathologic study of stage IIB, III, and IVA carcinoma of the cervix: Extended diagnostic evaluation for paraaortic node metastasis—A Gynecologic Oncology Group study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
57
2
6

Year Published

1991
1991
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 186 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
57
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, a Gynecologic Oncology Group study involving 264 patients found the sensitivity of a CT scan for identifying para-aortic nodal metastasis to be only 34% for cervical carcinoma (8). In non-small cell lung cancers, Prenzel et al reported that the overall positive predictive value was 30.8%, using 80 preoperative CT scans in the diagnosis of the involvement of mediastinal lymph node metastasis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a Gynecologic Oncology Group study involving 264 patients found the sensitivity of a CT scan for identifying para-aortic nodal metastasis to be only 34% for cervical carcinoma (8). In non-small cell lung cancers, Prenzel et al reported that the overall positive predictive value was 30.8%, using 80 preoperative CT scans in the diagnosis of the involvement of mediastinal lymph node metastasis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In women presenting with nodal involvement (N1), the 5-year overall survival is dramatically reduced by nearly 30-40% in comparison to that of patients classified as N0 [22,23,24]. In particular, para-aortic nodal status has been shown to be the most powerful parameter for patient outcomes [25,26]. On the other hand, the recent introduction of combined therapies including radiation therapy plus sensitising chemotherapy gives rise to rational hopes in terms of prolonged survival [27,28,29].…”
Section: N Stagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a minority of centers (14%) in our study use LAG for nodal status evaluation, most of them use CT or NMR, which are known to be less sensitive and speci®c than LAG. However, as shown by the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG), LAG has a sensitivity of 79% and speci®city of 73%, whereas CT and ultrasound have sensitivities of 34 and 19%, and speci®ci-ties of 96 and 99%, respectively [15]. The importance and utility of LAG, especially if external radiotherapy is planned, is con®rmed by the work of Bonin et al, who demonstrated that bony landmarks are not an adequate substitute for LAG for the localization of pelvic lymph nodes [3].…”
Section: Pretreatment Evaluation and Staging In Cervical Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is used by 11 centers, concomitant chemo±radiation therapy by 15 There is a general trend to introduce more and more chemotherapy with higher stage disease. Cisplatin is the most commonly used chemotherapeutic agent.…”
Section: Chemotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%