2023
DOI: 10.4244/eij-d-22-00914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical outcomes of the ACURATE neo2 transcatheter heart valve: a prospective, multicentre, observational, post-market surveillance study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Paravalvular leak with the ACURATE neo2 is improved over the first generation ACURATE neo, with postmarket surveillance studies reporting low rates of significant PVR with the ACURATE neo2 (1.9% moderate or greater AR). 16 In accordance, the overall presence of AR in this unselected COMALIGN-neo2 patient cohort was low; moderate AR occurred in less than 1.0% and none/trace was noted in 65%. However, TAVs implanted with severe CMA exhibited a 1.5 higher rate of ≥mild AR as compared to valves in which severe CMA was avoided.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Paravalvular leak with the ACURATE neo2 is improved over the first generation ACURATE neo, with postmarket surveillance studies reporting low rates of significant PVR with the ACURATE neo2 (1.9% moderate or greater AR). 16 In accordance, the overall presence of AR in this unselected COMALIGN-neo2 patient cohort was low; moderate AR occurred in less than 1.0% and none/trace was noted in 65%. However, TAVs implanted with severe CMA exhibited a 1.5 higher rate of ≥mild AR as compared to valves in which severe CMA was avoided.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“… 12 The ACURATE neo2 PMCF study and SOURCE 3 registry reported 30-day new PPI rates lower than their respective premarket rates of 6.5 and 12.0%. 13 , 14 Due to the variation of PPI rates across studies, either due to sample size, chance, or other factors, cross-study comparisons should be considered with caution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%