2022
DOI: 10.1111/aej.12712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical outcomes of non‐surgical root canal obturations using NeoMTA: A retrospective series of case reports

Abstract: NeoMTA is a commercially available tricalcium silicate‐based cement intended for contact with pulp and periradicular tissues. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the outcomes of non‐surgical root canal treatments with NeoMTA obturations. Patients were treated in a private endodontic practice between 2015 and 2018. All cases, including initial treatments and retreatments, were either fully obturated with NeoMTA, or using gutta‐percha with NeoMTA as an endodontic sealer. Outcomes were asses… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the next stage, a total of 27 full‐text articles were assessed for eligibility. After manuscript evaluation, a total of 10 papers were not included because they focused on non‐premixed CaSi sealers, namely BioRoot RCS ( n = 4) (Bardini et al., 2021; Khandelwal et al., 2022; Bel Haj Salah et al., 2021; Zavattini et al., 2022), MTA Fillapex ( n = 2) (Coşar et al., 2023; Ferreira et al., 2020), Pro Root MTA ( n = 1) (Thakur et al., 2013), Neo MTA ( n = 1) (Walsh et al., 2023) or Nishika BG ( n = 1) a Bioglass‐containing paste to paste sealer (Supreet et al., 2023). One study was excluded due to the presence of a premixed sealer with no specified composition (no SDS was reported) associated with a polymer based obturation system (polyamide core with an outer bonded hydrophilic polymer) (Nagar et al., 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the next stage, a total of 27 full‐text articles were assessed for eligibility. After manuscript evaluation, a total of 10 papers were not included because they focused on non‐premixed CaSi sealers, namely BioRoot RCS ( n = 4) (Bardini et al., 2021; Khandelwal et al., 2022; Bel Haj Salah et al., 2021; Zavattini et al., 2022), MTA Fillapex ( n = 2) (Coşar et al., 2023; Ferreira et al., 2020), Pro Root MTA ( n = 1) (Thakur et al., 2013), Neo MTA ( n = 1) (Walsh et al., 2023) or Nishika BG ( n = 1) a Bioglass‐containing paste to paste sealer (Supreet et al., 2023). One study was excluded due to the presence of a premixed sealer with no specified composition (no SDS was reported) associated with a polymer based obturation system (polyamide core with an outer bonded hydrophilic polymer) (Nagar et al., 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%