2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical outcomes of lithium disilicate single crowns and partial fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
140
3
12

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 233 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
9
140
3
12
Order By: Relevance
“…The survival rate of 96.6% at 35.9 ± 9.2 months in the present study was similar to those reported in previous studies (95.4 and 97.8%) [17,18] . A possible explanation for the high survival rates in the present study was the location of crowns, as 89.7% of all LD crowns were on anterior teeth.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The survival rate of 96.6% at 35.9 ± 9.2 months in the present study was similar to those reported in previous studies (95.4 and 97.8%) [17,18] . A possible explanation for the high survival rates in the present study was the location of crowns, as 89.7% of all LD crowns were on anterior teeth.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…As to SCs, after 2 years of simulated or real service, 100% survival rates were noticed in both laboratory [25] and clinical investigations [26]; in in vitro studies 100% survival rate was reported after 5 years of simulated function as well [20, 27] while the percentage changed to 97.8% in in vivo clinical investigations [26]. Differently, as regards FDPs, the cumulative survival rates at 5 years ranged from 75% to 100% in vitro [28, 29] while the equivalent clinical rate was 78.1% [26]; long-term laboratory investigations simulating more than 10 years of service showed 70% survival rate [30], comparable to the in vivo cumulative survival rate of 70.9% after 10 years of function [26]. The sound level of agreement between in vitro and in vivo data confirmed that laboratory investigations could represent a good simulation of the clinical scenario; nonetheless, this conclusion has to be considered only indicative, since the amount of data is not large enough to indicate consolidated clinical guidelines [24].…”
Section: Mechanical Testing and Fracture Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…22,23 Because the etching procedure can be easily performed either in the dental laboratory or chairside, etchable glass ceramics are popular in clinical practice. [24][25][26] A variety of millable ceramics are available. 27,28 IPS e.max CAD (Ivoclar Vivadent AG) is a lithium disilicate, Li 2 Si 2 O 5 containing 35 to 45 vol% of evenly dispersed 1 to 5 mm leucite crystals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%