2017
DOI: 10.5980/jpnjurol.108.137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Outcomes of Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Retrospective Analysis of 500 Cases From a Single Institution

Abstract: (Objectives) Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) is becoming a more popular alternative for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair in Japan in the recent years. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of LSC. (Patients and methods) This is a retrospective study on all the LSC cases that were performed in Urogynecology center, Kameda Medical Center, Japan from January 2013 to March 2016. Medical records of all the patients were retrieved and details on operating time, estimated blood loss, perioperative … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LSC became widespread with the technological development of laparoscopes, and after the FDA issued a warning about TVM, the number of facilities performing LSC gradually increased. In Japan, LSC was first covered by health insurance in 2016 and has since become a widespread treatment for POP 10,11) . In the present case, colpocleisis was previously performed twice; however, prolapse recurred.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LSC became widespread with the technological development of laparoscopes, and after the FDA issued a warning about TVM, the number of facilities performing LSC gradually increased. In Japan, LSC was first covered by health insurance in 2016 and has since become a widespread treatment for POP 10,11) . In the present case, colpocleisis was previously performed twice; however, prolapse recurred.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surgical vision under laparoscopy was superior to that with the naked eye under open laparotomy, which enabled precise suturing. We chose the laparoscopic repair technique because the procedure could be performed in the same field of view as laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, which has been performed on patients with pelvic organ prolapse in our department 6 . Studies have reported a cure rate of 86–100% following laparoscopic VVF repair 7–9 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%