2020
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2020-136395
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia Treated with Gilteritinib Who Received Prior Midostaurin or Sorafenib

Abstract: Background: Gilteritinib is a FLT3 inhibitor with demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients with FLT3-mutated relapsed or refractory (R/R) AML. The efficacy of gilteritinib in patients with prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy is not clearly defined. The phase 1/2 CHRYSALIS trial demonstrated the safety and antileukemic activity of gilteritinib in a FLT3-mutation-enriched R/R AML population (Perl AE, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2017). The phase 3 ADMIRAL trial demonstrated the superiority of gilteritinib … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Perl and colleagues investigated whether prior FLT3i therapy influenced outcomes in patients treated with gilteritinib. Regardless of prior FLT3i therapy, gilteritinib-treated patients had CRc rates >40%, however, the median OS with single-agent gilteritinib was 6.5 vs 9.6 months in prior FLT3i exposed ( n = 31) vs naive patients ( n = 216) with FLT3 mut R/R AML 74 . These data suggests that although responses may still be achieved with gilteritinib in patients refractory to prior first-generation FLT3i-based therapies, optimization with doublet or triplet combinations with second-generation FLT3i is likely needed to significantly improve OS with prior TKI exposure.…”
Section: Future Directionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Perl and colleagues investigated whether prior FLT3i therapy influenced outcomes in patients treated with gilteritinib. Regardless of prior FLT3i therapy, gilteritinib-treated patients had CRc rates >40%, however, the median OS with single-agent gilteritinib was 6.5 vs 9.6 months in prior FLT3i exposed ( n = 31) vs naive patients ( n = 216) with FLT3 mut R/R AML 74 . These data suggests that although responses may still be achieved with gilteritinib in patients refractory to prior first-generation FLT3i-based therapies, optimization with doublet or triplet combinations with second-generation FLT3i is likely needed to significantly improve OS with prior TKI exposure.…”
Section: Future Directionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…23 and , 1024 , respectively (Fig 4A and Data Supplement). The median OS in mCRc patients achieving molecular response (n 5 15; , 10 22 ) was 11.6 months (95% CI, 7.43 to NR) and 8.2 months (95% CI, 1.05 to NR) in those who did not (n 5 10; Fig 4B).…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This study became the basis for the registration of gilteritinib monotherapy in 2019 in the treatment of R/R AML with FLT3 mutation [21]. There is also evidence confirming the effectiveness of treatment with second-generation FLT3 kinase inhibitors in patients previously treated with midostaurin or sorafenib [22]. The presented case of the first patient previously treated with midostaurin proves the validity of the use of gilteritinib in the treatment of chemoresistant AML FLT3 recurrence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%