Clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention stratified according to duration of pain-to-balloon time and type of myocardial infarction

Staszczak, Bartłomiej; Siudak, Zbigniew; Malinowski, Krzysztof Piotr; Jędrychowska, Magdalena; Zabojszcz, Michał; Dolecka-Ślusarczyk, Magdalena; Janion−Sadowska, Agnieszka; Susuł, Michał; Tokarek, Tomasz; Bartuś, Joanna; Pawlik, Artur; Socha, Sylwia; Surdacki, Andrzej; Bartuś, Stanisław; Januszek, Rafał

doi:10.5603/cj.a2021.0074

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 13 publications

(22 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains the primary interventional treatment for ACS [ 2 , 3 ]. However, approximately 15–46% of patients suffering from cardiovascular diseases develop MACEs following PCI [ 4 , 5 , 6 ]. As a worldwide health issue, cardiovascular health (CVH) has generated extensive concern among global scholars.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Predictive Value of Cardiovascular Health Score for Health Outcomes in Patients with PCI: Comparison between Life’s Simple 7 and Life’s Essential 8

Gao

Ping

et al. 2023

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The American Heart Association recently published an updated algorithm for quantitative assessments of cardiovascular health (CVH) metrics, namely Life’s Essential 8 (LE8). This study aimed to compare the predictive value between Life’s Simple 7 (LS7) and LE8 and predict the likelihood of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to determine the utility of the LE8 in predicting CVH outcomes. A total of 339 patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who had undergone PCI were enrolled to assess the CVH scores using the LS7 and LE8. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was employed to evaluate the predictive value of the two different CVH scoring systems at 2 years for MACEs. Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that both the LS7 and LE8 scores were protective factors for MACEs (HR = 0.857, [95%CI: 0.78–0.94], HR = 0.964, [95%CI: 0.95–0.98]; p < 0.05, respectively). Receiver operator characteristic analysis indicated that the area under the curve (AUC) of LE8 was higher than that of LS7 (AUC: 0.662 vs. 0.615, p < 0.05). Lastly, in the LE8 score, diet, sleep health, serum glucose levels, nicotine exposure, and physical activity were found to be correlated with MACEs (HR = 0.985, 0.988, 0.993, 0.994, 0.994, respectively). Our study established that LE8 is a more reliable assessment system for CVH. This population-based prospective study reports that an unfavorable cardiovascular health profile is associated with MACEs. Future research is warranted to evaluate the effectiveness of optimizing diet, sleep health, serum glucose levels, nicotine exposure, and physical activity in reducing the risk of MACEs. In conclusion, our findings corroborated the predictive value of Life’s Essential 8 and provided further evidence for the association between CVH and the risk of MACEs.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Predictive Value of Cardiovascular Health Score for Health Outcomes in Patients with PCI: Comparison between Life’s Simple 7 and Life’s Essential 8

Gao

Ping

et al. 2023

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention stratified according to duration of pain-to-balloon time and type of myocardial infarction

Abstract: This article has been peer reviewed and published immediately upon acceptance.It is an open access article, which means that it can be downloaded, printed, and distributed freely, provided the work is properly cited. Articles in "Cardiology Journal" are listed in PubMed.

Cited by 1 publication

References 13 publications

Predictive Value of Cardiovascular Health Score for Health Outcomes in Patients with PCI: Comparison between Life’s Simple 7 and Life’s Essential 8

Predictive Value of Cardiovascular Health Score for Health Outcomes in Patients with PCI: Comparison between Life’s Simple 7 and Life’s Essential 8

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About