2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.03.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical outcomes from maximum-safe resection of primary and metastatic brain tumors using awake craniotomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

5
25
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
5
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…24 In our initial experience, 80 patients had total or near total resection, which represents a good resection range, comparable to or better than the 91% of total or near total resection reported thus far. 25 The rate of new neurological damage has been reported to be 18-23% has been reported. 26,27,28 In our study, 91% of patients had either improved or no change in their neurological status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 In our initial experience, 80 patients had total or near total resection, which represents a good resection range, comparable to or better than the 91% of total or near total resection reported thus far. 25 The rate of new neurological damage has been reported to be 18-23% has been reported. 26,27,28 In our study, 91% of patients had either improved or no change in their neurological status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 In our initial experience, 80 patients had total or near total resection, which represents a good resection range, comparable to or better than the 91% of total or near total resection reported thus far. 25 The rate of new neurological damage has been reported to be 18-23% has been reported. 26,27,28 In our study, 91% Here, a retrospective analysis was conducted on patients undergoing an awake craniotomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 The rate of new neurological damage has been reported to be 18-23% has been reported. 26,27,28 In our study, 91% Here, a retrospective analysis was conducted on patients undergoing an awake craniotomy. Although the number of cases was limited, our results suggest the promising prospects for performing awake craniotomy to remove glioblastomas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 In our initial experience, 80 patients had total or near total resections, which represents a good resection range, comparable to or better than the 91% total or near total resection rate reported thus far. 25 The rate of new neurological damage has been reported to be 18-23%. 26,27,28 In our study, 91% of patients had either improved or no change in their neurological status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 The rate of new neurological damage has been reported to be 18-23%. 26,27,28 In our study, 91% of patients had either improved or no change in their neurological status. Only 7 patients experienced new neurological dysfunction and a reduced KPS score after surgery, including worsening of their pre-existing neurological dysfunction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%