Clinical outcomes for 61 cases of hypopharyngeal cancer with synchronous esophageal cancer

Yang, Shixuan; Yang, Shuang; Liao, Wenjun; Huang, Rui; Li, Baisen; Lü, Shun; Li, Chao; Wang, Zhaohui; Li, Chunhua; Pei, Jiao; Wen, Hao; Zhang, Shichuan

doi:10.1093/jrr/rrz042

Cited by 6 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The induction chemotherapy regimen for patients in group A was two 21-day cycles of paclitaxel, platinum, and fluorouracil (TPF) [ 6 , 7 ]. Two weeks after the completion of induction chemotherapy, the outcomes were evaluated using enhanced neck CT, stroboscopic laryngoscopy, and in some cases biopsy.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The function of the pharynx, larynx, trachea, and oesophagus should be considered in the management of advanced hypopharyngeal carcinoma with cervical oesophageal invasion. Several studies [ 5 , 6 ] have investigated the treatment of hypopharyngeal and oesophageal carcinoma. However, there is little experience in the treatment of advanced hypopharyngeal carcinoma with cervical oesophageal invasion.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Induction chemotherapy for the individualised treatment of hypopharyngeal carcinoma with cervical oesophageal invasion: a retrospective cohort study

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background This study aimed to evaluate the potential of induction chemotherapy as an indicator of the management of advanced hypopharyngeal carcinoma with cervical oesophageal invasion. Methods Sixty-eight patients admitted to our hospital between February 2003 and November 2016 with stage IVB hypopharyngeal carcinoma with cervical oesophageal invasion were retrospectively analysed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the treatment they selected following an explanation of the different treatments available. Patients in group A received induction chemotherapy and had (1) complete/partial remission following chemotherapy and radiotherapy/concurrent chemoradiotherapy or (2) stable disease following chemotherapy and surgery. Patients in group B underwent surgery followed by adjuvant radiotherapy/concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan–Meier method, and differences between the groups were evaluated using the log-rank test. Laryngeal and oesophageal retention rates were compared using the cross-tabulation test. Results The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 22.86% and 11.43% in group A and 24.25% and 6.06% in group B, respectively (all P > 0.05). The laryngeal and oesophageal retention rates were 40.0% and 74.3% in group A and 0.0% and 27.3% in group B, respectively (all P < 0.01). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of post-operative complications between the two groups (group A 8.6%, group B 12.1%; P > 0.05). Conclusions Induction chemotherapy may be an appropriate first choice to ensure laryngeal and oesophageal preservation in the individualised treatment of advanced hypopharyngeal carcinoma with cervical oesophageal invasion.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Induction chemotherapy for the individualised treatment of hypopharyngeal carcinoma with cervical oesophageal invasion: a retrospective cohort study

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The induction chemotherapy regimen for patients in Group A was two 21-day cycles of paclitaxel, platinum, and uorouracil (TPF) (6,7). Two weeks after the completion of induction chemotherapy, the outcomes were evaluated using enhanced neck CT, stroboscopic laryngoscopy, and in some cases biopsy.…”

Section: Treatment Regimensmentioning

confidence: 99%

Induction chemotherapy for the individualised treatment of hypopharyngeal carcinoma with cervical oesophageal invasion: a retrospective cohort study

Huang

Wang

Fang

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential of induction chemotherapy as an indicator of the management of advanced hypopharyngeal carcinoma with cervical oesophageal invasion. Methods: Sixty-eight patients admitted to our hospital between February 2003 and November 2016 with stage IVB hypopharyngeal carcinoma with cervical oesophageal invasion were retrospectively analysed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the treatment they selected following an explanation of the different treatments available. Patients in Group A received induction chemotherapy and had (1) complete/partial remission following chemotherapy and radiotherapy/concurrent chemoradiotherapy or (2) stable disease following chemotherapy and surgery. Patients in Group B underwent surgery followed by adjuvant radiotherapy/concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan–Meier method, and differences between the groups were evaluated using the log-rank test. Laryngeal and oesophageal retention rates were compared using the cross-tabulation test. Results: The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 22.86% and 11.43% in Group A and 24.25% and 6.06% in Group B, respectively (all P > 0.05). The laryngeal and oesophageal retention rates were 40.0% and 74.3% in Group A and 0.0% and 27.3% in Group B, respectively (all P < 0.01). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of post-operative complications between the two groups (Group A: 8.6%, Group B: 12.1%; P > 0.05). Conclusions: Induction chemotherapy may be an appropriate first choice to ensure laryngeal and oesophageal preservation in the individualised treatment of advanced hypopharyngeal carcinoma with cervical oesophageal invasion.

show abstract

“…In the management of advanced hypopharyngeal cancer with cervical oesophageal invasion, the function of the pharynx, larynx, trachea, and oesophagus should be considered. Many studies have investigated the treatment of concomitant hypopharyngeal cancer and oesophageal cancer (4)(5). However, there is little experience in the treatment of advanced hypopharyngeal cancer with cervical oesophageal invasion.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Induction Chemotherapy for the Individualized Treatment of Hypopharyngeal Cancer with Oesophageal Invasion: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Huang

Wang

Fang³

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the potential for induction chemotherapy to be an indicator for the management of advanced hypopharyngeal carcinoma with cervical oesophageal invasion.Methods: Sixty-eight patients (admitted to our department between February 2003 and November 2016) with stage IVB hypopharyngeal cancer with cervical oesophageal invasion were retrospectively analysed. Patients were divided into two groups depending on the treatment they selected following an explanation they received on the different treatments. Group A patients received induction chemotherapy and had (1) complete or partial remission following chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy or (2) stable disease following chemotherapy combined with surgery. Group B patients underwent surgery and received adjuvant radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy following surgery. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan–Meier method, differences between the two groups were tested using the log-rank test, and the laryngeal and oesophageal retention rates were compared using the cross-tabulation test. Results: The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates of patients in Group A were 22.86% and 11.43%, respectively; in Group B, the rates were 24.25% and 6.06%, respectively (P > 0.05 for all). The laryngeal retention rates in Group A and B patients were 40% and 0%, respectively, whereas the oesophageal retention rates in Group A and B patients were 74.3% and 27.3%, respectively (P < 0.01 for all). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (Group A: 8.6%, Group B: 12.1%, P > 0.05). Conclusions: For patients with advanced hypopharyngeal cancer with cervical oesophageal invasion, induction chemotherapy could be the appropriate first choice for individualized treatment to ensure laryngeal and oesophageal cancer preservation.

show abstract

Clinical outcomes for 61 cases of hypopharyngeal cancer with synchronous esophageal cancer

Cited by 6 publications

References 13 publications

Induction chemotherapy for the individualised treatment of hypopharyngeal carcinoma with cervical oesophageal invasion: a retrospective cohort study

Induction chemotherapy for the individualised treatment of hypopharyngeal carcinoma with cervical oesophageal invasion: a retrospective cohort study

Induction chemotherapy for the individualised treatment of hypopharyngeal carcinoma with cervical oesophageal invasion: a retrospective cohort study

Induction Chemotherapy for the Individualized Treatment of Hypopharyngeal Cancer with Oesophageal Invasion: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About