2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.06.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical outcomes and utilization from over a decade of planned oocyte cryopreservation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are consistent with findings from recent studies which found a strategy of social freezing leads to higher live-birth rates per cycle compared with morphology-based assessment of embryos in older women [ 14 , 20 ]. For example, using a decision tree model,, Devine and colleagues predicted that oocyte cryopreservation would decrease cost per live birth from US$55,060 to US$39,946 (and increase the odds of live birth from 42% to 62%) for women who freeze their oocytes at age 35 years and defer pregnancy attempts until age 40 years [ 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results are consistent with findings from recent studies which found a strategy of social freezing leads to higher live-birth rates per cycle compared with morphology-based assessment of embryos in older women [ 14 , 20 ]. For example, using a decision tree model,, Devine and colleagues predicted that oocyte cryopreservation would decrease cost per live birth from US$55,060 to US$39,946 (and increase the odds of live birth from 42% to 62%) for women who freeze their oocytes at age 35 years and defer pregnancy attempts until age 40 years [ 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Social freezing, where autologous oocytes are collected and cryopreserved at a younger age for potential future use, is increasingly used as an option to negate the risk of age-related fertility loss [ 13 ]. In a recent retrospective US study of 921 women who vitrified their oocytes between 2006 and 2020, women who cryopreserved their oocytes before aged 38 achieved a higher cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) (38.9%) than those who planned their oocytes cryopreservation after age 38 (25%) [ 14 ]. This is also shown in a previous study by Cobo and colleagues who reported CLBR increased for every additional oocytes in women below 36 years old but this reached a plateau for older women ≥ age 36 [ 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While not all studies have provided specific time frames for the return rates, some findings suggest conflicting implications regarding the utilization of cryopreserved oocytes based on the age at vitrification. Similar to our results, which showed a constant and gradual increase to utilize with age, Leung et al 20 observed that individuals who eventually utilized their frozen eggs tended to be from older age groups (38 years or older), suggesting a possible preference among women of advanced age to return for thawing and using their cryopreserved oocytes. However, as absolute numbers are small, more research is needed to capture the factors influencing the timing and rates of returning for oocyte thawing and utilization, considering various aspects of fertility preservation and assisted reproductive technologies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…It is important to note that the utilization rate can be influenced by factors such as the patient population, length of follow-up, and potential confounding by indication. In our previous single-center analysis, 20 we found that 7.4% of patients returned to warm in our practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
“… 12 Besides, the frozen-thaw cycle survival oocyte rate was shown to be around 70%, but the euploid rate was only around 30%, decreasing with maternal age. 13 Although in the latest decade, with the vitrification technology becoming mature and being widely introduced into clinical practice, 14 evidence showed that the clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate of planned oocyte cryopreservation were more promising, and pregnancies using frozen oocytes had no difference in fertilisation and ongoing pregnancy rate when compared with fresh oocyte pregnancies. 15 16 Still, there is a lack of long-term follow-up studies on children born under this procedure because oocyte cryopreservation has yet not been used for a long time as a non-experimental clinical technique.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%