2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2022.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical outcomes among out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients treated by extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: The CRITICAL study in Osaka

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Combining PaCO 2 with pre-speci ed criteria(5, 16, 21) (Supplementary Table 2) could further increase the percentage of favorable outcomes. For example, adding PaCO 2 < 70 mmHg to the selection criteria in the CRITICAL study (21), the FO rate will improve from 19-33% with the exclusion of three patients with FO from our cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combining PaCO 2 with pre-speci ed criteria(5, 16, 21) (Supplementary Table 2) could further increase the percentage of favorable outcomes. For example, adding PaCO 2 < 70 mmHg to the selection criteria in the CRITICAL study (21), the FO rate will improve from 19-33% with the exclusion of three patients with FO from our cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 20 Notably, previous studies have indicated that a shorter time to implement ECPR may result in better outcomes, highlighting the potential importance of early recognition of refractory VF/VT and prompt activation of the ECPR team to enhance patient outcomes. 21 , 22 , 23 , 34 Furthermore, prehospital ECPR systems have already been implemented in some regions. 24 , 25 We expect that the models in this study have potential to improve the criteria to activate prehospital ECPR teams.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates that the PaCO 2 level could be used as a powerful indicator in addition to traditional selection criteria. Combining PaCO 2 with pre-specified criteria [5,18,23] (Supplementary Table 2) could further increase the percentage of favorable outcomes. For example, adding PaCO 2 < 70 mmHg to the selection criteria in the CRITI-CAL study [23], the FO rate will improve from 19 to 33% with the exclusion of three patients with FO from our cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%