2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(01)70407-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical outcome of the use of enteral stents for palliation of patients with malignant upper GI obstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

10
70
0
4

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
10
70
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This series also achieved a good clinical outcome (defined as the ability to eat or retain feeds without vomiting) in 80.6% of patients. The reported range of good clinical outcome is 80-100% [6,8,14,15,20]. The result of our series are in agreement with the above-stated numbers, with a technical success rate of 100% and initial clinical improvement of obstructive symptoms of 100%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This series also achieved a good clinical outcome (defined as the ability to eat or retain feeds without vomiting) in 80.6% of patients. The reported range of good clinical outcome is 80-100% [6,8,14,15,20]. The result of our series are in agreement with the above-stated numbers, with a technical success rate of 100% and initial clinical improvement of obstructive symptoms of 100%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In some series, the technical success for stent deployment has been reported to be as high as 100% [3,15,19]. The largest series [20] reports a 93.5% success rate with the placement of 31 stents in 29 patients. This series also achieved a good clinical outcome (defined as the ability to eat or retain feeds without vomiting) in 80.6% of patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a recently published study, Yim et al [58] retrospectively compared a group of patients who had endoscopic enteral stenting with a similar cohort of patients with pancreatic cancer who had surgical gastrojejunostomy. Their study found that endoscopic enteral stenting was much less expensive then surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Die Implantation von Duodenalstents ist eine zunehmend angewandte Alternative und gelingt technisch in nahezu allen Fällen. Allerdings zwingen Komplikationen, Tumoreinbruch oder -überwuchs zu einer Revision in bis zu 50% der Fälle [15,16]. Eine prospektiv-randomisierte Studie zum Vergleich Gastroenterostomie vs. Duodenalstent wird zurzeit deutschlandweit durchgeführt.…”
unclassified