Abstract:The clinical outcomes of 2,054 renal recipients were examined retrospectively based on pre-transplant hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) status to investigate the efficacy of lamivudine treatment in HBsAg positive recipients. Pre-transplant HBsAg positivity was documented in 66 recipients. The 10-year patient and graft survival rates in Ag positive group were significantly lower than those of Ag negative group (64.4/36.6% vs. 88.2/70.5%, respectively, P < 0.0001). Since 1997, lamivudine was used when hepatiti… Show more
“…Chan et al (14) described 12 HBsAgϩ recipients who received lamivudine preemptively, i.e., when a increase in HBV DNA levels with or without elevation in aminotransferase levels were detected, had similar renal allograft recipient survival compared with HBSAgϪ controls in contrast to their HBVinfected recipients transplanted before lamivudine was available. Ahn et al (17) included transplants performed between 1979 and 2004 and found 10-year patient, graft, and death-censored graft survival were inferior in HBsAgϩve (n ϭ 66) compared with HBsAgϪve (n ϭ 1988) recipients. However, in 27 HBsAgϩve recipients who received lamivudine, 10-year patient overall and kidney death censored survivals were comparable with HBsAgϪve recipients.…”
SummaryBackground and objectives Pre-existing hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection has been associated in inferior renal transplant outcomes. We examined outcomes of HBVϩ renal recipients in a more recent era with availability of oral anti-viral agents.Design, setting, participants, & measurements Using the Organ Procurement Transplant Network/United Network for Organ Sharing database, we selected adult primary kidney recipients transplanted in the United States (2001 to 2007). The cohort was divided into HBVϩ (surface antigen positive, n ϭ 1346) and HBVϪ patients (surface antigen negative; n ϭ 74,335). Five-year graft survival, patient survival, hepatic failure incidence, and associated adjusted risks were compared.Results HBVϩ recipients were more frequently Asian, had a lower body mass index, and glomerulonephritis was more prevalent as the etiology of ESRD. HBVϩ recipients had less pretransplant diabetes and cardiovascular disease, were less likely a living donor recipient, and were less likely to receive steroids at discharge. Five-year patient survival was 85.3% and 85.6% and graft survival was 74.9% and 75.1% for HBVϩ and HBVϪ, respectively. HBV infection was not a risk factor for death or kidney failure, although 5-year cumulative incidence of hepatic failure was higher in HBVϩ recipients (1.3% versus 0.2%; P Ͻ 0.001), and HBVϩ was associated with 5.5-and 5.2-fold increased risk for hepatic failure in living and deceased donors, respectively, compared with HBVϪ.
ConclusionsIn a recent era (2001 to 2007), HBV-infected renal recipients were not at higher risk for kidney failure or death; however, they remain at higher risk of liver failure compared with HBVϪ recipients.
“…Chan et al (14) described 12 HBsAgϩ recipients who received lamivudine preemptively, i.e., when a increase in HBV DNA levels with or without elevation in aminotransferase levels were detected, had similar renal allograft recipient survival compared with HBSAgϪ controls in contrast to their HBVinfected recipients transplanted before lamivudine was available. Ahn et al (17) included transplants performed between 1979 and 2004 and found 10-year patient, graft, and death-censored graft survival were inferior in HBsAgϩve (n ϭ 66) compared with HBsAgϪve (n ϭ 1988) recipients. However, in 27 HBsAgϩve recipients who received lamivudine, 10-year patient overall and kidney death censored survivals were comparable with HBsAgϪve recipients.…”
SummaryBackground and objectives Pre-existing hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection has been associated in inferior renal transplant outcomes. We examined outcomes of HBVϩ renal recipients in a more recent era with availability of oral anti-viral agents.Design, setting, participants, & measurements Using the Organ Procurement Transplant Network/United Network for Organ Sharing database, we selected adult primary kidney recipients transplanted in the United States (2001 to 2007). The cohort was divided into HBVϩ (surface antigen positive, n ϭ 1346) and HBVϪ patients (surface antigen negative; n ϭ 74,335). Five-year graft survival, patient survival, hepatic failure incidence, and associated adjusted risks were compared.Results HBVϩ recipients were more frequently Asian, had a lower body mass index, and glomerulonephritis was more prevalent as the etiology of ESRD. HBVϩ recipients had less pretransplant diabetes and cardiovascular disease, were less likely a living donor recipient, and were less likely to receive steroids at discharge. Five-year patient survival was 85.3% and 85.6% and graft survival was 74.9% and 75.1% for HBVϩ and HBVϪ, respectively. HBV infection was not a risk factor for death or kidney failure, although 5-year cumulative incidence of hepatic failure was higher in HBVϩ recipients (1.3% versus 0.2%; P Ͻ 0.001), and HBVϩ was associated with 5.5-and 5.2-fold increased risk for hepatic failure in living and deceased donors, respectively, compared with HBVϪ.
ConclusionsIn a recent era (2001 to 2007), HBV-infected renal recipients were not at higher risk for kidney failure or death; however, they remain at higher risk of liver failure compared with HBVϪ recipients.
“…However, a study have revealed that 5 years patient and graft survival rates were similar between HbsAg(+) and HbsAg(-) patients (1). Ahn et al revealed that, 27 HbsAg(+) recipients' (who were treated with lamivudine) graft and patients survival rates were similar to the HbsAg(-) patients (16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Some studies revealed that 5 years patient survival rate was worse in HbsAg(+) patients, while another study revealed that HbsAg positivity had no impact on patient survival rate (12)(13)(14)(15)(16). However, a study have revealed that 5 years patient and graft survival rates were similar between HbsAg(+) and HbsAg(-) patients (1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the effectivness of antiviral treatment, interferon or nucleoside analogues in HBV(+) patients have been demonstrated by some authors (16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Many studies have been performed in order to determine the effects of HBV infection on graft or survival rates and liver complications after Rtx to HBV(+) patients (1,(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17). Also, the effectivness of antiviral treatment, interferon or nucleoside analogues in HBV(+) patients have been demonstrated by some authors (16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22).…”
Abstract:Aim: Our aim was to compare the short and long term clinical outcomes of HbsAg(+) renal transplant recipients with HbsAg(-) recipients. Patients and Methods: Two hundered and four patients who underwent renal transplantation in our center between 2001 and 2014 were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups. Group 1: HbsAg(-) group (n=136) and Group 2: HbsAg(+) group (n=68). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of lymphocyte cross matches, numbers of mismatches, immunosuppressive treatment protocols and induction treatments. In HbsAg(+) group, 51 patients were HBV DNA(+), 64 patients were HbeAg(-) and 4 patients were HbeAg(+). Fifty-seven (83.8%) patients were treated with Lamivudine, 4 (5.9%) patients with Entecavir and 7 (10.3%) patients with Tenofovir for Hepatitis B infection. Graft and patient survival rates, graft functions, acute hepatitis rates, acute rejection rates and other clinical outcomes of the groups were compared. Results: Demographic data and immuologic risk profiles of the groups were similar. Acute rejection rates, graft survival rates and patient survival rates were similar. Acute hepatitis rates, glomerular filtration rates on the last controls and delayed graft function rates were higher in Group 2, while chronic allograft disfunction and new onset
Powered by Editorial Manager® and ProduXion Manager® from Aries Systems Corporationdiabetes mellitus after transplantation (NODAT) rates were similar between the groups. Conclusion: Our study revealed that, graft and patient survival and acute rejection rates were similar between HbsAg(+) and HbsAg(-) recipients, while acute hepatitis rate was higher in HbsAg(+) recipients. Results: Demographic data and immuologic risk profiles of the groups were similar. Acute rejection rates, graft survival rates and patient survival rates were similar. Acute hepatitis rates, glomerular filtration rates on the last controls and delayed graft function rates were higher in Group 2, while chronic allograft disfunction and new onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation (NODAT) rates were similar between the groups.
Powered by Editorial Manager® and ProduXion Manager® from Aries Systems Corporation
Conclusion:Our study revealed that, graft and patient survival and acute rejection rates were similar between HbsAg(+) and HbsAg(-) recipients, while acute hepatitis rate was higher in HbsAg(+) recipients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.