Clinical Outcome of Lentis Comfort Intraocular Lens Implantation

Nakajima, Daisuke; Takahashi, Hiroshi; Kobayakawa, Shinichiro

doi:10.1272/jnms.jnms.2021_88-504

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Previous studies have reported improved distance vision, higher contrast sensitivity, less halo and glare, and better image quality with Mplus series IOLs. 13 , 30 , 31 The series includes an LS-312 model with a C-loop haptics and an LS-313 model with a plate haptics, with different near addition powers from +1.5 D to +3.0 D. A previous study showed satisfactory VA of Mplus LS-312 MF30, with peaks at distance and near foci. 18 Alió et al.…”

Section: Intraocular Lens (Iol) For Presbyopia Correctionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effects of premium intraocular lenses on presbyopia treatments

Zhu

Zhong

2022

Advances in Ophthalmology Practice and Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Intraocular Lens (Iol) For Presbyopia Correctionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effects of premium intraocular lenses on presbyopia treatments

Zhu

Zhong

2022

Advances in Ophthalmology Practice and Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The lens has an optical loss of 5% and is designed to focus 95% of the time, resulting in good postoperative contrast sensitivity. [10][11][12][13] Another lens, a monofocal IOL (ZCB00 [Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc., Santa Ana, CA, USA]), is made of hydrophobic transparent acrylic material. It is a one-piece, single-focal IOL with a 6.0 mm optical section that has a at aspheric front surface and negative spherical aberration, designed to minimize spherical aberration across the eye and improve contrast after cataract surgery.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Visual Performance between Monofocal and Rotationally Asymmetric Refractive Intraocular Lenses

Miyoshi,

Tanabe,

Shojo

et al. 2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective or Purpose We compared the visual performance of a monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) (ZCB00) and a rotationally asymmetric refractive IOL with +1.5 diopters near addition (Lentis Comfort LS-313 MF15). Design Retrospective Comparative Case Series. Subjects, Participants, and/or Controls A total of 1352 eyes of 676 patients were enrolled; the ZCB00 group comprised 904 eyes of 452 patients (72.3 ± 6.8 years; females/males, 268/184), and the LS-313 MF15 group included 448 eyes of 224 patients (73.6 ± 7.0 years; females/males, 125/99). Methods, Intervention, or Testing We investigated postoperative parameters ten weeks after surgery from both eyes of cataract patients who underwent bilateral implantation with one of the two IOLs within three months between 2011 and 2019. A linear mixed-effects model was used for both eyes, strictly adjusting for sex, age, subjective refraction spherical equivalent, subjective refraction cylinder, corneal astigmatism, axial length, corneal higher-order aberrations, and pupil diameter to ensure statistical validity. Main Outcome Measures Visual acuity at different distances, contrast sensitivity with and without glare, the quality of vision assessed by the Japanese version of the NEI VFQ-25, and the use of spectacles after surgery. Results The corrected distance visual acuity was significantly better,and the higher-order aberrations (ocular/internal, scaled to a 4/6-mm pupil; WF_4_post_O_TotalHOA, _Third, _Fourth, _Trefoil, _Coma, _Tetrafoil, _Spherical; WF_4_post_I_TotalHOA, _Third, _Fourth, _Trefoil, _Coma, _Tetrafoil, _Spherical, WF_6_post_O_Spherical, and WF_6_post_I_Spherical) were significantly smaller in the ZCB00 group (p<0.00068, Wald test). Contrast sensitivity with glare (6.3 degrees) and spectacle independence (near) were significantly better in the LS-313 MF15 group (p<0.00068, Wald test). Conclusions In terms of visual parameters, each IOL group displayed different characteristics at a high level of performance.

show abstract

“…It is a one-piece, multifocal IOL composed of hydrophilic, transparent acrylic material, with a segmental aspheric optical section in one half for distance and in the other half that provides + 1.5 D near addition. The lens has an optical loss of 5% and is designed to focus 95% of the time, resulting in good postoperative contrast sensitivity [10][11][12][13] .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Visual Performance between Monofocal and Rotationally Asymmetric Refractive Intraocular Lenses

Miyoshi¹,

Tanabe²,

Shojo³

et al. 2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We compared the visual performance of a monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) (ZCB00) and a rotationally asymmetric refractive IOL with + 1.5 diopters near addition (Lentis Comfort LS-313 MF15) by investigating postoperative parameters ten weeks after surgery from both eyes of cataract patients who underwent bilateral implantation with one of the two IOLs within three months between 2011 and 2019. A total of 1352 eyes of 676 patients were enrolled; the ZCB00 group comprised 904 eyes of 452 patients (72.3 ± 6.8 years; females/males, 268/184), and the LS-313 MF15 group included 448 eyes of 224 patients (73.6 ± 7.0 years; females/males, 125/99). A linear mixed-effects model using data for both eyes, with strict adjustments for sex, age, subjective refraction spherical equivalent, subjective refraction cylinder, corneal astigmatism, axial length, corneal higher-order aberrations, and pupil diameter, ensured statistical validity. Corrected distance visual acuity was significantly better, and the higher-order aberrations (ocular/internal, scaled to a 4/6-mm pupil; WF_4_post_O_TotalHOA, _Third, _Fourth, _Trefoil, _Coma, _Tetrafoil, _Spherical; WF_4_post_I_TotalHOA, _Third, _Fourth, _Trefoil, _Coma, _Tetrafoil, _Spherical, WF_6_post_O_Spherical, and WF_6_post_I_Spherical) were significantly smaller in the ZCB00 group (p < 0.00068, Wald test). Contrast sensitivity with glare (6.3 degrees) and spectacle independence (near) were significantly better in the LS-313 MF15 group (p < 0.00068, Wald test).

show abstract

Clinical Outcome of Lentis Comfort Intraocular Lens Implantation

Abstract: To evaluate visual outcome and patient satisfaction following Lentis Comfort intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. Method: This retrospective case series examined 68 eyes of 41 patients (mean age 72.0 ± 8.1 years) who underwent Lentis Comfort (LS-313 MF15, Oculentis GmbH,

Cited by 4 publications

References 25 publications

The effects of premium intraocular lenses on presbyopia treatments

The effects of premium intraocular lenses on presbyopia treatments

Comparison of Visual Performance between Monofocal and Rotationally Asymmetric Refractive Intraocular Lenses

Comparison of Visual Performance between Monofocal and Rotationally Asymmetric Refractive Intraocular Lenses

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About